Annals of clinical biochemistry · 2012
The relative effects of fat versus muscle mass on cystatin C and estimates of renal function in healthy young men.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chew-Harris Janice S C, Florkowski Christopher M, George Peter M, Elmslie Jane L, Endre Zoltan H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: It is well known that plasma creatinine concentration is affected by muscle mass, while some studies have suggested cystatin C is affected by body mass index (BMI). Our aim was to assess the effects of lean versus fat mass on cystatin C and creatinine derivative equations in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in healthy young men.
METHODS: Three groups of participants were studied: those classified as normal (BMI 18-25 kg/m(2) with body fat <30%); muscular subjects (BMI >30 kg/m(2) and body fat <20%); and obese subjects (BMI >30 kg/m(2) and body fat >30%). All underwent diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid GFR, bio-electrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition analysis, measurement of plasma cystatin C, creatinine and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and completed a diet record.
RESULTS: Cystatin C was highest in the obese group (0.77 mg/L; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.69-0.77) and creatinine was highest in the muscular group (90.1 μmol/L; 95% CI 84.3-96.0). On multivariate analysis, body fat and GFR (P = 0.003) were significant determinants of cystatin C; muscle mass and age affected creatinine significantly (P = 0.02). Using cystatin C equations, Le Bricon and Hoek showed significantly lower estimated GFR in the obese group but performed reasonably well within 50%, 30% and 20% of GFR. Creatinine equations showed significant underestimations of GFR for the muscular group.
CONCLUSIONS: Body fat is a significant determinant of cystatin C while creatinine concentration is highly affected by muscle mass and age. Body composition plays an important role in the interpretation of renal function. Cystatin C equations are still accurate in predicting GFR in our healthy male group without chronic kidney disease.
METHODS: Three groups of participants were studied: those classified as normal (BMI 18-25 kg/m(2) with body fat <30%); muscular subjects (BMI >30 kg/m(2) and body fat <20%); and obese subjects (BMI >30 kg/m(2) and body fat >30%). All underwent diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid GFR, bio-electrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition analysis, measurement of plasma cystatin C, creatinine and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and completed a diet record.
RESULTS: Cystatin C was highest in the obese group (0.77 mg/L; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.69-0.77) and creatinine was highest in the muscular group (90.1 μmol/L; 95% CI 84.3-96.0). On multivariate analysis, body fat and GFR (P = 0.003) were significant determinants of cystatin C; muscle mass and age affected creatinine significantly (P = 0.02). Using cystatin C equations, Le Bricon and Hoek showed significantly lower estimated GFR in the obese group but performed reasonably well within 50%, 30% and 20% of GFR. Creatinine equations showed significant underestimations of GFR for the muscular group.
CONCLUSIONS: Body fat is a significant determinant of cystatin C while creatinine concentration is highly affected by muscle mass and age. Body composition plays an important role in the interpretation of renal function. Cystatin C equations are still accurate in predicting GFR in our healthy male group without chronic kidney disease.