Neuroradiology · 2025
Evaluating a clinically available artificial intelligence model for intracranial aneurysm detection: a multi-reader study and algorithmic audit.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hu Bin, He Haitao, Shi Zhao, Wang Li, Liu Quanhui, Sun Zhiyuan, Zhang Longjiang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We aimed to validate a clinically available artificial intelligence (AI) model to assist general radiologists in the detection of intracranial aneurysm (IA) in a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) study, and to explore its performance in routine clinical settings.
METHODS: Two distinct cohorts of head CT angiography (CTA) data were assembled to validate an AI model. Cohort 1, comprising gold-standard consecutive CTA cases, was used in an MRMC study involving six board-certified general radiologists. Cohort 2, representing clinical CTA cases, was used to simulate a routine clinical setting. Following these evaluations, an algorithmic audit was conducted to identify any unusual or unexpected behaviors exhibited by the model.
RESULTS: Cohort 1 consisted of 131 CTA cases, while Cohort 2 included 515 CTA cases. In the MRMC study, the AI-assisted strategy demonstrated a significant improvement in aneurysm diagnostic performance, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increasing from 0.815 (95%CI: 0.754-0.875) to 0.875 (95%CI: 0.831-0.921; p = 0.008). In the AI-based first-reader study, 60.4% of the CTA cases were identified as negative by the AI, with a high negative predictive value of 0.994 (95%CI: 0.977-0.999). The algorithmic audit highlighted two issues for improvement: the accurate detection of tiny aneurysms and the effective exclusion of false-positive lesions.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the clinical utility of a high-performance AI model in detecting IAs, significantly improving general radiologists' diagnostic performance with the potential to reduce their workload in routine clinical practice. The algorithmic audit offers insights to guide the development and validation of future AI models.
METHODS: Two distinct cohorts of head CT angiography (CTA) data were assembled to validate an AI model. Cohort 1, comprising gold-standard consecutive CTA cases, was used in an MRMC study involving six board-certified general radiologists. Cohort 2, representing clinical CTA cases, was used to simulate a routine clinical setting. Following these evaluations, an algorithmic audit was conducted to identify any unusual or unexpected behaviors exhibited by the model.
RESULTS: Cohort 1 consisted of 131 CTA cases, while Cohort 2 included 515 CTA cases. In the MRMC study, the AI-assisted strategy demonstrated a significant improvement in aneurysm diagnostic performance, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increasing from 0.815 (95%CI: 0.754-0.875) to 0.875 (95%CI: 0.831-0.921; p = 0.008). In the AI-based first-reader study, 60.4% of the CTA cases were identified as negative by the AI, with a high negative predictive value of 0.994 (95%CI: 0.977-0.999). The algorithmic audit highlighted two issues for improvement: the accurate detection of tiny aneurysms and the effective exclusion of false-positive lesions.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the clinical utility of a high-performance AI model in detecting IAs, significantly improving general radiologists' diagnostic performance with the potential to reduce their workload in routine clinical practice. The algorithmic audit offers insights to guide the development and validation of future AI models.