Heliyon · 2022
Introducing surface-to-surface matching technique to evaluate mandibular symmetry: A retrospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xie Yajuan, Zeng Runling, Yan Jiayin, Yan Tong, Tan Jiali
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study introduced a three-dimensional (3D) surface-to-surface matching technique to evaluate the mandibular symmetry of teenagers and adults with unilateral second molar scissor bite.
METHODS: The targets came from 73 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with unilateral second molar scissor bite, including teenagers (n = 30) and adults (n = 43). 73 images without scissor bite and matched in sex and age were selected as controls. The scans were developed into 3D mandible models and seven mandibular functional unit models, including condylar process (Co), coronoid process (Cr), mandibular ramus (Ra), mandibular angle (Ma), alveolar process (Ap), mandibular body (Mb) and chin process (Ch). The surface-to-surface matching technique was introduced. 3D deviation analysis and matching percentages calculation were performed and compared to evaluate the symmetry of the mandible.
RESULTS: Comparisons were made between the study samples and control samples. For teenagers, the matching percentages of the entire mandible (55.31 ± 7.24%), Mb (69.04 ± 9.22%) and Co (65.19 ± 10.67%) in the study group were lower than that of the entire mandible (60.87 ± 6.38%) (P <0.01), Mb (75.0 ± 8.71%) (P <0.05) and Co (70.25 ± 8.20%) (P <0.05) in the control group. While Ap, Ra, Ch, Cr and Ma showed no statistically significant differences (P >0.05). For adults, the matching percentages of the entire mandible (48.88 ± 9.77%), Ap (65.83 ± 11.21%), Mb (64.43 ± 12.03%), Ch (79.17 ± 10.29%), Ra (64.11 ± 9.84%) and Co (61.08 ± 11.64%) in the study group were lower than the entire mandible (59.28 ± 5.49%) (P <0.01), Ap (73.65 ± 9.10%) (P <0.01), Mb (71.66 ± 8.40%) (P <0.01), Ch (83.86 ± 5.59%) (P <0.05), Ra (68.54 ± 7.87%) (P <0.05) and Co (66.20 ± 10.62%) (P <0.05) of the control group. Only Cr and Ma showed no statistically significant differences (P >0.05).
CONCLUSION: Mandibular asymmetry was observed in both teenagers and adults with unilateral second molar scissor bite. Moreover, compared with teenagers, more mandibular units of adult patients were affected.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the surface-to-surface matching technique, the symmetric and morphological information of the mandible can be converted into visual color maps and quantitative descriptions. This method can bring convenience to the study of the growth of mandible, orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery design.
METHODS: The targets came from 73 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with unilateral second molar scissor bite, including teenagers (n = 30) and adults (n = 43). 73 images without scissor bite and matched in sex and age were selected as controls. The scans were developed into 3D mandible models and seven mandibular functional unit models, including condylar process (Co), coronoid process (Cr), mandibular ramus (Ra), mandibular angle (Ma), alveolar process (Ap), mandibular body (Mb) and chin process (Ch). The surface-to-surface matching technique was introduced. 3D deviation analysis and matching percentages calculation were performed and compared to evaluate the symmetry of the mandible.
RESULTS: Comparisons were made between the study samples and control samples. For teenagers, the matching percentages of the entire mandible (55.31 ± 7.24%), Mb (69.04 ± 9.22%) and Co (65.19 ± 10.67%) in the study group were lower than that of the entire mandible (60.87 ± 6.38%) (P <0.01), Mb (75.0 ± 8.71%) (P <0.05) and Co (70.25 ± 8.20%) (P <0.05) in the control group. While Ap, Ra, Ch, Cr and Ma showed no statistically significant differences (P >0.05). For adults, the matching percentages of the entire mandible (48.88 ± 9.77%), Ap (65.83 ± 11.21%), Mb (64.43 ± 12.03%), Ch (79.17 ± 10.29%), Ra (64.11 ± 9.84%) and Co (61.08 ± 11.64%) in the study group were lower than the entire mandible (59.28 ± 5.49%) (P <0.01), Ap (73.65 ± 9.10%) (P <0.01), Mb (71.66 ± 8.40%) (P <0.01), Ch (83.86 ± 5.59%) (P <0.05), Ra (68.54 ± 7.87%) (P <0.05) and Co (66.20 ± 10.62%) (P <0.05) of the control group. Only Cr and Ma showed no statistically significant differences (P >0.05).
CONCLUSION: Mandibular asymmetry was observed in both teenagers and adults with unilateral second molar scissor bite. Moreover, compared with teenagers, more mandibular units of adult patients were affected.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the surface-to-surface matching technique, the symmetric and morphological information of the mandible can be converted into visual color maps and quantitative descriptions. This method can bring convenience to the study of the growth of mandible, orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery design.