MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.09.020

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of forensic and legal medicine · 2015

The mechanism of the keyhole lesion reassessed: An experimental approach.

Delannoy Yann, Colard Thomas, Le Garff Erwan, Humez Sarah, Gosset Didier, Hedouin Valéry

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The initial description of the keyhole defect was detailed as a peculiar gunshot entrance wound in the cranial vault due to firearm discharge in a tangential path. This injury may be described in two parts: a rounded section with inner table beveling and a triangular section with outer table beveling. We report a case of a gunshot skull wound "keyhole" shaped, appeared to have been made perpendicularly to the bone. Performing an experimental study on cranial bones with shots made perpendicularly to the skull approved this hypothesis, and bone injuries were then architecturally characterised using high-resolution micro computed tomography. The singular link between the tangential gunshot path and the keyhole pattern has been refuted several times, and some authors have hypothesised that there is an important role for concentric fractures that occur far away from the initial impact point of the bullet. Micro computed tomography analysis of the bone showed these keyhole defect features with a particular high description. Then, the whole pattern has a spider-web effect, and these concentric fractures could explain the keyhole pattern even in a perpendicular gunshot path.

Для цитирования: Delannoy Yann, Colard Thomas, Le Garff Erwan, Humez Sarah, Gosset Didier, Hedouin Valéry. The mechanism of the keyhole lesion reassessed: An experimental approach.. Journal of forensic and legal medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.09.020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.