MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol.102.591

Медицинская библиотека · Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology · 2011

[A case of renal malacoplakia that was difficult to distinguish from cystic renal cell carcinoma].

Hyuga Taiju, Nakamura Shigenobu, Ishino Toshikatsu, Kawakami Kazuo

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 66 years old man visited our hospital with a chief complaint of right flank pain and abdominal palpable mass. Abdominal enhanced computed tomography scan showed a large cystic mass with infiltrating surrounding tissue in the right kidney. We diagnosed it infected cystic renal cell carcinoma because of high grade fever and acute inflammatory response. It was surgically unresectable tumor. Therefore, percutaneous puncture and drainage was performed under ultrasound guidance. In the culture of drainage fluid, Escherichia coli (E. coli) was isolated. Then, we confirmed reduction in the size of the tumor, right radical nephrectomy was performed. Because of tumor invasion to ascending colon, we performed the excision of right kidney together with ascending colon. Histological study confirmed target-shaped Michaelis-Gutmann body, and the definitive diagnosis was malacoplakia of the kidney. We reported a case of renal malacoplakia that was difficult to distinguish from cystic renal cell carcinoma. Our case is 12th case of renal malacoplakia in the Japanese literature.

Для цитирования: Hyuga Taiju, Nakamura Shigenobu, Ishino Toshikatsu, Kawakami Kazuo. [A case of renal malacoplakia that was difficult to distinguish from cystic renal cell carcinoma].. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology. 2011. DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol.102.591.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.