Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2020
The need for maxillary osteotomy after primary cleft surgery: A systematic review framing a retrospective study.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tache Ana, Mommaerts Maurice Y
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the rate of maxillary osteotomies after cleft palate surgery following a standardized two-stage palatoplasty protocol. In order to improve our treatment strategy, the results were compared with the data extracted from the literature by means of a systematic review.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
PATIENTS: Non-syndromic cleft lip, alveolus, and palate patients with complete records who underwent primary cleft palate surgery.
INTERVENTION: The incidence of midface hypoplasia after primary cleft surgery that required surgical intervention was retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the final 51 patients included in our retrospective analysis, two required a maxillary repositioning osteotomy. The frequency was lower than reported in the literature. In the literature, there was no difference between patients treated according to a one-stage protocol (21%) and patients treated according to a two-stage protocol (20.8%), but a higher incidence of pharyngeal surgery was noted in the two-stage closure group. Only the cleft type, timing of hard palate closure, and orthodontic treatment proved to influence the need for maxillary osteotomy.
CONCLUSION: Our protocol shows promising results and needs more validation.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
PATIENTS: Non-syndromic cleft lip, alveolus, and palate patients with complete records who underwent primary cleft palate surgery.
INTERVENTION: The incidence of midface hypoplasia after primary cleft surgery that required surgical intervention was retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the final 51 patients included in our retrospective analysis, two required a maxillary repositioning osteotomy. The frequency was lower than reported in the literature. In the literature, there was no difference between patients treated according to a one-stage protocol (21%) and patients treated according to a two-stage protocol (20.8%), but a higher incidence of pharyngeal surgery was noted in the two-stage closure group. Only the cleft type, timing of hard palate closure, and orthodontic treatment proved to influence the need for maxillary osteotomy.
CONCLUSION: Our protocol shows promising results and needs more validation.