MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.acuro.2011.06.003

Медицинская библиотека · Actas urologicas espanolas · 2011

[Robotic partial nephrectomy: an initial experience in 25 consecutive cases].

Castillo O A, Rodríguez-Carlin A, López-Fontana G, Vidal-Mora I, Gómez R

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To report our initial experience with robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in a series of 25 consecutively-operated patients.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A series of 25 consecutive patients who underwent RPN from April 2010 to February 2011 were studied. We used the da Vinci S HD robotic system with transperitoneal approach. Total renal hilum control was used 22 cases and 3 patients underwent selective renal parenchymal compression with an ad-hoc device.

RESULTS

Mean age was 55.8 years (26-77) with a male/female ratio of 2:1. Mean operative time was 117.6 minutes (54-205) and the warm ischemia time was 20.2 minutes (9-34). Mean estimated blood loss was 440 ml (20-2000) and the mean tumor size was 3.25 cm (1-5.3). Five patients (20%) had complications, the most frequent being intraoperative bleeding (Clavien II). There was no conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. Mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (1-7). The pathological study revealed renal cell carcinoma in 19 cases and benign lesions in 6 patients. There were no positive surgical margins and no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results show that RPN is a feasible surgical approach in small-sized renal tumors.

Для цитирования: Castillo O A, Rodríguez-Carlin A, López-Fontana G, Vidal-Mora I, Gómez R. [Robotic partial nephrectomy: an initial experience in 25 consecutive cases].. Actas urologicas espanolas. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2011.06.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.