Journal of pediatric surgery · 2016
Is fundoplication required after the Foker procedure for long gap esophageal atresia?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wanaguru Dylan, Langusch Catherine, Krishnan Usha, Varjavandi Vincent, Jiwane Ashish, Adams Susan, Henry Guy
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Fundoplication has been performed almost universally in children treated with the Foker procedure (FP) for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). We report our experience with pharmacological management and endoscopic surveillance rather than early routine fundoplication in infants treated with the FP.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all children treated with the Foker procedure at our institution.
RESULTS: Nine children have undergone the FP since 2007. Median time between FP and definitive anastomoses was 22days. All nine children kept their native esophagus. There were three minor anastomotic leaks, all treated nonoperatively. All children required dilatation of anastomotic strictures (range 2-15). All have been treated with proton pump inhibitors. Three children had eosinophilic esophagitis and one had Barrett's esophagus. Only two children in this series have undergone fundoplication, which was performed for symptomatic and persistent erosive esophagitis.
CONCLUSION: The question of early versus delayed fundoplication in LGEA patients managed with the FP remains unanswered. Our series demonstrates that it is possible to achieve good long-term outcomes when the operation is reserved for children with gastroesophageal reflux disease resistant to maximal medical therapy.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all children treated with the Foker procedure at our institution.
RESULTS: Nine children have undergone the FP since 2007. Median time between FP and definitive anastomoses was 22days. All nine children kept their native esophagus. There were three minor anastomotic leaks, all treated nonoperatively. All children required dilatation of anastomotic strictures (range 2-15). All have been treated with proton pump inhibitors. Three children had eosinophilic esophagitis and one had Barrett's esophagus. Only two children in this series have undergone fundoplication, which was performed for symptomatic and persistent erosive esophagitis.
CONCLUSION: The question of early versus delayed fundoplication in LGEA patients managed with the FP remains unanswered. Our series demonstrates that it is possible to achieve good long-term outcomes when the operation is reserved for children with gastroesophageal reflux disease resistant to maximal medical therapy.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.