Annali italiani di chirurgia · 2015
Tension-free primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arer Ilker Murat, Yabanoglu Hakan, Caliskan Kenan
Аннотация
AIM: Pilonidal disease (PD) is a common disorder that usually affects young population and generally seen in intergluteal region. Conservative and surgical treatment options have been utilized. Many surgical techniques including primary closure, marsupialization and flap procedures have been described. The present study aims to evaluate the optimal surgical method for the treatment of PD.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 151 patients underwent pilonidal disease surgery between January 2007 and September 2014 were enrolled in this study. Patients were compared according to age, sex, operation time, length of
RESULTS: A total of 151 patients with a mean age of 25.18 years (range 14-66) presented with pilonidal disease were evaluated. Primary closure (PC) and tension-free primary closure (TFPC) were performed in 105 (69.5%) and 46 (30.5%) patients, respectively. There was no statistical difference between groups according to age, sex, operation time and length of hospital stay. Only 9 patients (8.6%) in PC and 3 patients (6.5%) in TFPC have postoperative recurrent disease. of 17 patients (7.9%) dehiscence was seen, 15 (14.3%) were in PC group and 2 (4.3%) were in TFPC group. Postoperative seroma or wound infection was seen in 16 patients (10.6%).
CONCLUSION: Tension-free primary closure is a method that is effective as primary closure.
KEY WORDS: Modified primary closure, Pilonidal disease, Primary closure.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 151 patients underwent pilonidal disease surgery between January 2007 and September 2014 were enrolled in this study. Patients were compared according to age, sex, operation time, length of
RESULTS: A total of 151 patients with a mean age of 25.18 years (range 14-66) presented with pilonidal disease were evaluated. Primary closure (PC) and tension-free primary closure (TFPC) were performed in 105 (69.5%) and 46 (30.5%) patients, respectively. There was no statistical difference between groups according to age, sex, operation time and length of hospital stay. Only 9 patients (8.6%) in PC and 3 patients (6.5%) in TFPC have postoperative recurrent disease. of 17 patients (7.9%) dehiscence was seen, 15 (14.3%) were in PC group and 2 (4.3%) were in TFPC group. Postoperative seroma or wound infection was seen in 16 patients (10.6%).
CONCLUSION: Tension-free primary closure is a method that is effective as primary closure.
KEY WORDS: Modified primary closure, Pilonidal disease, Primary closure.