MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocw127

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017

Changes in the quality of care during progress from stage 1 to stage 2 of Meaningful Use.

Levine David M, Healey Michael J, Wright Adam, Bates David W, Linder Jeffrey A, Samal Lipika

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) canceled Meaningful Use (MU), replacing it with Advancing Care Information, which preserves many MU elements. Therefore, transitioning from MU stage 1 to MU stage 2 has important implications for the new policy, yet the quality of care provided by physicians transitioning from MU1 to MU2 is unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal evaluation of the quality of care delivered by outpatient physicians at an academic medical center in the transition between MU1 and MU2.

RESULTS

Between MU1 and MU2, 4 measures improved: hypertension control (35% vs 40%), influenza immunization (63% vs 68%), tobacco use assessment/counseling (86% vs 96%), and diabetes control (93% vs 96%; P all <.01). One worsened: senior weight screening/follow-up (54% vs 49%; P  < .01). Two were unchanged: chlamydia screening and adult weight screening/follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In this single-site study, when clinicians progressed from MU1 to MU2, 4 quality measures improved, 2 were unchanged, and 1 worsened. Analysis of national data should guide policy decisions about the content of MU's successor.

Для цитирования: Levine David M, Healey Michael J, Wright Adam, Bates David W, Linder Jeffrey A, Samal Lipika. Changes in the quality of care during progress from stage 1 to stage 2 of Meaningful Use.. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. 2017. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw127.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.