MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement · 1998

Aspects on the actual practice of surgical management of urinary incontinence in Norway and Finland.

Lose G, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Nilsson C G

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate aspects of the actual practice of surgical management of urinary incontinence in Norway and Finland.

METHOD: A questionnaire about preoperative diagnostic procedures, type of surgery, follow-up procedure and number of operations per center and per surgeon per year (1995) was sent to all departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Norway and Finland.

RESULT: Thirty-one (86%) of the Norwegian and 26 (90%) of the Finnish departments returned the questionnaire. More than 90% of the departments performed preoperative urodynamic evaluation. Burch colposuspension was used by more than 90% of the departments in the two countries. Generally the number of procedures per center and per department was low. Twenty-nine and 12% of the departments respectively did not perform any follow-up after surgery. Only 16% of the Norwegian and 23% of the Finnish centers had controlled results of surgery.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be a need for criteria of good clinical practice or a reference program for all steps of surgical management of stress incontinence in order to stimulate the process of quality development of this treatment.

Для цитирования: Lose G, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Nilsson C G. Aspects on the actual practice of surgical management of urinary incontinence in Norway and Finland.. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement. 1998.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.