Simulation-Based Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops: A Reproducible Model for Sustainable Education.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kantar Rami S, Breugem Corstiaan C, Keith Kristen, Kassam Serena, Vijayakumar Charanya, Bow Mikaela, Alfonso Allyson R, Chahine Elsa M, Ghotmi Lilian H, Patel Krishna G, Shetye Pradip R, Santiago Pedro E, Losee Joseph E, Steinbacher Derek M, Rossell-Perry Percy, Garib Daniela G, Alonso Nivaldo, Mann Robert J, Prada-Madrid Jose Rolando, Esenlik Elçin, Pamplona María Del Carmen, Collares Marcus Vinícius Martins, Bennun Ricardo D, Kummer Ann, Giugliano Carlos, Padwa Bonnie L, Raposo-Amaral Cassio Eduardo, Tse Raymond, Sommerlad Brian, Flores Roberto L, Hamdan Usama S
Аннотация
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation.
SETTING: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop.
PARTICIPANTS: Total of 180 participants.
INTERVENTIONS: Three-day simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of workshop participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with the workshop, satisfaction with simulation-based workshops as educational tools, impact on cleft surgery procedural confidence, short-term impact on clinical practice, medium-term impact on clinical practice.
RESULTS: The workshop included 180 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 54.5%, with participants reporting high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop and with simulation-based workshops as educational tools. Participants reported a significant improvement in cleft lip (33.3 ± 5.7 vs 25.7 ± 7.6; P < .001) and palate (32.4 ± 7.1 vs 23.7 ± 6.6; P < .001) surgery procedural confidence following the simulation sessions. Participants also reported a positive short-term and medium-term impact on their clinical practices.
CONCLUSION: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops are well received by participants, lead to improved cleft surgery procedural confidence, and have a sustained positive impact on participants' clinical practices. Future efforts should focus on evaluating and quantifying this perceived positive impact, as well reproducing these efforts in other areas of need.