Saudi medical journal · 2008
The predictive value of extensor grip test for the effectiveness of treatment for tennis elbow.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zehtab Mohammad J, Mirghasemi Alireza, Majlesara Ali, Tajik Parvin, Siavashi Babak
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 5 different modalities, and determine the usefulness of recently proposed extensor grip test (EGT) in predicting the response to treatment.
METHODS: In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 92 of 98 tennis elbow patients in Sina Hospital Tehran, Iran between 2006 and 2007 fulfilled the trial entry criteria. Among these patients 56 (60.9%) had positive EGT result. The stratified EGT result, were randomly allocated to 5 treatment groups: brace, physiotherapy, brace plus physiotherapy, injection, and injection plus physiotherapy.
RESULTS: Patients with a positive EGT result had better response to treatments. Among them, injection plus physiotherapy was the most successful, then brace plus physiotherapy, physiotherapy, and brace injection was the worst treatment modality. Response to treatment was comparable in all groups between EGT positive and negative patients except bracing, in which positive EGT was correlated with a dramatic response to treatment.
CONCLUSION: In all patients, injection plus physiotherapy and then brace plus physiotherapy is recommended, but in EGT negatives, bracing seems to be of no use. Injection alone is not recommended in either group.
METHODS: In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 92 of 98 tennis elbow patients in Sina Hospital Tehran, Iran between 2006 and 2007 fulfilled the trial entry criteria. Among these patients 56 (60.9%) had positive EGT result. The stratified EGT result, were randomly allocated to 5 treatment groups: brace, physiotherapy, brace plus physiotherapy, injection, and injection plus physiotherapy.
RESULTS: Patients with a positive EGT result had better response to treatments. Among them, injection plus physiotherapy was the most successful, then brace plus physiotherapy, physiotherapy, and brace injection was the worst treatment modality. Response to treatment was comparable in all groups between EGT positive and negative patients except bracing, in which positive EGT was correlated with a dramatic response to treatment.
CONCLUSION: In all patients, injection plus physiotherapy and then brace plus physiotherapy is recommended, but in EGT negatives, bracing seems to be of no use. Injection alone is not recommended in either group.