Obstetrics and gynecology · 1998
Transurethral injection of silicone microimplants for intrinsic urethral sphincter deficiency.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koelbl H, Saz V, Doerfler D, Haeusler G, Sam C, Hanzal E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term efficacy of transurethral injection of silicone microimplants in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency.
METHODS: During January 1995 and December 1996, 32 women (mean age 64.3 years, range 39-85 years) with type III stress incontinence (intrinsic sphincter deficiency) underwent transurethral injection of silicone microimplants under general anesthesia. Twenty-eight had undergone previous continence surgery. Subjective and urodynamic assessments were made at 6 and 12 months after injection to evaluate success and short-term effects.
RESULTS: Objective and subjective success rates were 75% and 59% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Injections of silicone microimplants significantly increased maximum urethral closure pressure (maximum urethral pressure at rest: 34.40+/-16.46 cm H2O, 95% confidence interval [CI] 28.55, 40.25 versus 25.35+/-10.78 cm H2O, 95% CI 21.52, 29.18; P = .027). There were no complications after surgery up to 1 year.
CONCLUSION: Transurethral silicone injections were effective in 60% of cases of intrinsic sphincter deficiency, although there was a time-dependent decrease.
METHODS: During January 1995 and December 1996, 32 women (mean age 64.3 years, range 39-85 years) with type III stress incontinence (intrinsic sphincter deficiency) underwent transurethral injection of silicone microimplants under general anesthesia. Twenty-eight had undergone previous continence surgery. Subjective and urodynamic assessments were made at 6 and 12 months after injection to evaluate success and short-term effects.
RESULTS: Objective and subjective success rates were 75% and 59% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Injections of silicone microimplants significantly increased maximum urethral closure pressure (maximum urethral pressure at rest: 34.40+/-16.46 cm H2O, 95% confidence interval [CI] 28.55, 40.25 versus 25.35+/-10.78 cm H2O, 95% CI 21.52, 29.18; P = .027). There were no complications after surgery up to 1 year.
CONCLUSION: Transurethral silicone injections were effective in 60% of cases of intrinsic sphincter deficiency, although there was a time-dependent decrease.