MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11606-022-07753-5

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of general internal medicine · 2022

Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Lowering and Days Free of Cardiovascular Events and Serious Adverse Events: a Post Hoc Analysis of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

Kim Dae Hyun, Tatsuoka Curtis, Chen Zhengyi, Wright Jackson T, Odden Michelle C, Beddhu Srinivasan, Bellows Brandon K, Bress Adam, Carson Thaddeus, Cushman William C, Johnson Karen C, Morisky Donald E, Punzi Henry, Tamariz Leonardo, Yang Song, Wei Lee-Jen

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Communication of the benefits and harms of blood pressure lowering strategy is crucial for shared decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the effect of intensive versus standard systolic blood pressure lowering in terms of the number of event-free days

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 9361 adults 50 years or older without diabetes or stroke who had a systolic blood pressure of 130-180 mmHg and elevated cardiovascular risk INTERVENTIONS: Intensive (systolic blood pressure goal <120 mmHg) versus standard blood pressure lowering (<140 mmHg) MAIN MEASURES: Days free of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), serious adverse events (SAE), and monitored adverse events (hypotension, syncope, bradycardia, electrolyte abnormalities, injurious falls, or acute kidney injury) over a median follow-up of 3.33 years KEY

RESULTS

The intensive treatment group gained 14.7 more MACE-free days over 4 years (difference, 14.7 [95% confidence interval: 5.1, 24.4] days) than the standard treatment group. The benefit of the intensive treatment varied by cognitive function (normal: difference, 40.7 [13.0, 68.4] days; moderate-to-severe impairment: difference, -15.0 [-56.5, 26.4] days; p-for-interaction=0.009) and self-rated health (excellent: difference, -22.7 [-51.5, 6.1] days; poor: difference, 156.1 [31.1, 281.2] days; p-for-interaction=0.001). The mean overall SAE-free days were not significantly different between the treatments (difference, -14.8 [-35.3, 5.7] days). However, the intensive treatment group had 28.5 fewer monitored adverse event-free days than the standard treatment group (difference, -28.5 [-40.3, -16.7] days), with significant variations by frailty status (non-frail: difference, 38.8 [8.4, 69.2] days; frail: difference, -15.5 [-46.6, 15.7] days) and self-rated health (excellent: difference, -12.9 [-45.5, 19.7] days; poor: difference, 180.6 [72.9, 288.4] days; p-for-interaction <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 4 years, intensive systolic blood pressure lowering provides, on average, 14.7 more MACE-free days than standard treatment, without any difference in SAE-free days. Whether this time-based effect summary improves shared decision-making remains to be elucidated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT01206062.

Для цитирования: Kim Dae Hyun, Tatsuoka Curtis, Chen Zhengyi, Wright Jackson T, Odden Michelle C, Beddhu Srinivasan, Bellows Brandon K, Bress Adam, Carson Thaddeus, Cushman William C, Johnson Karen C, Morisky Donald E, Punzi Henry, Tamariz Leonardo, Yang Song, Wei Lee-Jen. Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Lowering and Days Free of Cardiovascular Events and Serious Adverse Events: a Post Hoc Analysis of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.. Journal of general internal medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07753-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.