Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
Fully Automated Assessment of Cardiac Chamber Volumes and Myocardial Mass on Non-Contrast Chest CT with a Deep Learning Model: Validation Against Cardiac MR.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schmitt Ramona, Schlett Christopher L, Sperl Jonathan I, Rapaka Saikiran, Jacob Athira J, Hein Manuel, Hagar Muhammad Taha, Ruile Philipp, Westermann Dirk, Soschynski Martin, Bamberg Fabian, Schuppert Christopher
Аннотация
Background: To validate the automated quantification of cardiac chamber volumes and myocardial mass on non-contrast chest CT using cardiac MR (CMR) as a reference. Methods: We retrospectively included 53 consecutive patients who received non-contrast chest CT and CMR within three weeks. A deep learning model created cardiac segmentations on axial soft-tissue reconstructions from CT, covering all four cardiac chambers and the left ventricular myocardium. Segmentations on CMR cine short-axis and long-axis images served as a reference. Standard estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for ventricular volumes at end-diastole and end-systole (LVEDV, LVESV, RVEDV, RVESV), left ventricular mass (LVM), and atrial volumes (LA, RA) at ventricular end-diastole. A qualitative assessment noted segmentation issues. Results: The deep learning model generated CT measurements for 52 of the 53 patients (98%). Based on CMR measurements, the average LVEDV was 166 ± 64 mL, RVEDV was 144 ± 51 mL, and LVM was 115 ± 39 g. The CT measurements correlated well with CMR measurements for LVEDV, LVESV, and LVM (ICC = 0.85, ICC = 0.84, and ICC = 0.91; all p < 0.001) and RVEDV and RVESV (ICC = 0.79 and ICC= 0.78; both p < 0.001), and moderately well with LA and RA (ICC = 0.74 and ICC = 0.61; both p < 0.001). Absolute agreements likewise favored LVEDV, LVM, and RVEDV. ECG-gating did not relevantly influence the results. The CT results correctly identified 7/15 LV and 1/1 RV as dilated (one and six false positives, respectively). Major qualitative issues were found in three cases (6%). Conclusions: Automated cardiac chamber volume and myocardial mass quantification on non-contrast chest CT produced viable measurements in this retrospective sample. Relevance Statement: An automated cardiac assessment on non-contrast chest CT provides quantitative morphological data on the heart, enabling a preliminary organ evaluation that aids in incidentally identifying at-risk patients who may benefit from a more targeted diagnostic workup.