Reproductive biomedicine online · 2021
Reproductive risks and preimplantation genetic testing intervention for X-autosome translocation carriers.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yuan Shimin, Cheng Dehua, Luo Keli, Li Xiurong, Hu Liang, Hu Hao, Wu Xianhong, Xie Pingyuan, Lu Changfu, Lu Guangxiu, Lin Ge, Gong Fei, Tan Yue-Qiu
Аннотация
RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the genetic cause of multiple congenital disabilities in a girl with a maternal balanced X-autosome translocation [t(X-A)]? Is preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), to distinguish non-carrier from euploid/balanced embryos and prioritize transfer, an effective and applicable strategy for couples with t(X-A)?
DESIGN: Karyotype analysis, whole-exome sequencing and X inactivation analysis were performed for a girl with congenital cardiac anomalies, language impairment and mild neurodevelopmental delay. PGT based on next-generation sequencing after microdissecting junction region (MicroSeq) to distinguish non-carrier and carrier embryos was used in three couples with a female t(X-A) carrier (cases 1-3).
RESULTS: The girl carried a maternal balanced translocation 46,X,t(X;1)(q28;p31.1). Whole-exome sequencing revealed no monogenic mutation related to her phenotype, but she carried a rare skewed inactivation of the translocated X chromosome that spread to the adjacent interstitial 1p segment, contrary to her mother. All translocation breakpoints in cases 1-3 were successfully identified and each couple underwent one PGT cycle. Thirty oocytes were retrieved, and 13 blastocysts were eligible for biopsy, of which six embryos had a balanced translocation and only four were non-carriers. Three cryopreserved embryo transfers with non-carrier status embryos resulted in the birth of two healthy children (one girl and one boy), who were subsequently confirmed to have normal karyotypes.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reported a girl with multiple congenital disabilities associated with a maternal balanced t(X-A) and verified that the distinction between non-carrier and carrier embryos is an effective and applicable strategy to avoid transferring genetic and reproductive risks to the offspring of t(X-A) carriers.
DESIGN: Karyotype analysis, whole-exome sequencing and X inactivation analysis were performed for a girl with congenital cardiac anomalies, language impairment and mild neurodevelopmental delay. PGT based on next-generation sequencing after microdissecting junction region (MicroSeq) to distinguish non-carrier and carrier embryos was used in three couples with a female t(X-A) carrier (cases 1-3).
RESULTS: The girl carried a maternal balanced translocation 46,X,t(X;1)(q28;p31.1). Whole-exome sequencing revealed no monogenic mutation related to her phenotype, but she carried a rare skewed inactivation of the translocated X chromosome that spread to the adjacent interstitial 1p segment, contrary to her mother. All translocation breakpoints in cases 1-3 were successfully identified and each couple underwent one PGT cycle. Thirty oocytes were retrieved, and 13 blastocysts were eligible for biopsy, of which six embryos had a balanced translocation and only four were non-carriers. Three cryopreserved embryo transfers with non-carrier status embryos resulted in the birth of two healthy children (one girl and one boy), who were subsequently confirmed to have normal karyotypes.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reported a girl with multiple congenital disabilities associated with a maternal balanced t(X-A) and verified that the distinction between non-carrier and carrier embryos is an effective and applicable strategy to avoid transferring genetic and reproductive risks to the offspring of t(X-A) carriers.