Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental · 2019
Intra-individual variation of clozapine and norclozapine plasma levels in clinical practice.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Turrion Maria Concepcion, Perez Jesus, Bernardo Miguel, Fernandez-Egea Emilio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Clozapine plasma levels are useful to monitor drug compliance, and also to assess and to prevent some side effects. Recently, routine monitoring to all clozapine-treated patients has been proposed to prevent relapses. However, high intra-individual variability in plasma levels has been reported too, although these studies have some limitations.
METHODS: We analysed differences between 2clozapine plasma levels separated by at least one year in a subgroup of 28 outpatients (82% male, mean age 47.9 years-old) with diagnosis of non-affective psychosis in clinical remission whose clozapine doses and smoking habits remained unchanged.
RESULTS: We found a non-significant increase in clozapine plasma levels [.30mg/L (SD=.14) vs. .32 (SD=.17); t=-.858, p=.40] and a significant decrease in norclozapine plasma levels [.27 (SD=.11) vs. .22 (SD=.10); t=3.27; p=.003]. Absolute coefficient of variation (CV) between first and second assessment were calculated. Forty-six and fifty-seven percent of cases had CV 20% in clozapine and norclozapine, respectively. CV of 50% was seen in 20.7% and 13.8% of clozapine and norclozapine test respectively. We discussed potential causes of such high CV.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggest high intra-individual variation even in a subgroup of very stable patients, which suggest that routine monitoring of these levels may be indicated in order to detect significant plasma variations. We think that clinicians should act with caution in case of a sudden decrease in plasma level. In the absence of obvious symptom severity variation, sources of intra-individual fluctuations might be considered first, before assuming poor compliance.
METHODS: We analysed differences between 2clozapine plasma levels separated by at least one year in a subgroup of 28 outpatients (82% male, mean age 47.9 years-old) with diagnosis of non-affective psychosis in clinical remission whose clozapine doses and smoking habits remained unchanged.
RESULTS: We found a non-significant increase in clozapine plasma levels [.30mg/L (SD=.14) vs. .32 (SD=.17); t=-.858, p=.40] and a significant decrease in norclozapine plasma levels [.27 (SD=.11) vs. .22 (SD=.10); t=3.27; p=.003]. Absolute coefficient of variation (CV) between first and second assessment were calculated. Forty-six and fifty-seven percent of cases had CV 20% in clozapine and norclozapine, respectively. CV of 50% was seen in 20.7% and 13.8% of clozapine and norclozapine test respectively. We discussed potential causes of such high CV.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggest high intra-individual variation even in a subgroup of very stable patients, which suggest that routine monitoring of these levels may be indicated in order to detect significant plasma variations. We think that clinicians should act with caution in case of a sudden decrease in plasma level. In the absence of obvious symptom severity variation, sources of intra-individual fluctuations might be considered first, before assuming poor compliance.