Heart, lung & circulation · 2024
Yield of Coronary Assessment in Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bhaskaran Ashwin, De Silva Kasun, Turnbull Samual, Wong Wilfred, Campbell Timothy, Bennett Richard G, Ong Andrew, Zaman Sarah, Kumar Saurabh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Coronary assessment is frequently conducted in patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT); however, its yield and subsequent treatment implications remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients presenting with SMVT, factors influencing clinician referral for coronary assessment, and clinical outcomes based on revascularisation or medical management of CAD.
METHOD: Consecutive patients presenting with acute SMVT requiring inpatient admission between 2017 and 2022 were identified.
RESULTS: A total of 249 individual patients with SMVT were identified, with 140 undergoing coronary assessment. Referral for coronary assessment was driven by chest pain (p<0.001) and increased troponin kinetics (p<0.001). No patient with SMVT had an acute coronary occlusion. Significant CAD was found in 48 (34%) patients, and traditional ischaemic features did not predict significant CAD. Nineteen (40%) patients with significant CAD underwent revascularisation (n=15 percutaneous coronary intervention, n=4 coronary artery bypass grafting). There was no significant difference in time to ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence between revascularised and medically managed CAD (hazard ratio 1.670; 95% confidence interval 0.756-3.687; p=0.199). A total of five of six patients who underwent a revascularisation-only strategy (no upfront antiarrhythmic therapy or ablation) had VT recurrence (median time to recurrence 8.9 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite being frequently performed, coronary assessment in SMVT has only modest yield, with no patients having an acute coronary occlusion. Traditional clinical factors of ischaemia did not improve this yield. Revascularisation alone did not improve freedom from VT.
METHOD: Consecutive patients presenting with acute SMVT requiring inpatient admission between 2017 and 2022 were identified.
RESULTS: A total of 249 individual patients with SMVT were identified, with 140 undergoing coronary assessment. Referral for coronary assessment was driven by chest pain (p<0.001) and increased troponin kinetics (p<0.001). No patient with SMVT had an acute coronary occlusion. Significant CAD was found in 48 (34%) patients, and traditional ischaemic features did not predict significant CAD. Nineteen (40%) patients with significant CAD underwent revascularisation (n=15 percutaneous coronary intervention, n=4 coronary artery bypass grafting). There was no significant difference in time to ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence between revascularised and medically managed CAD (hazard ratio 1.670; 95% confidence interval 0.756-3.687; p=0.199). A total of five of six patients who underwent a revascularisation-only strategy (no upfront antiarrhythmic therapy or ablation) had VT recurrence (median time to recurrence 8.9 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite being frequently performed, coronary assessment in SMVT has only modest yield, with no patients having an acute coronary occlusion. Traditional clinical factors of ischaemia did not improve this yield. Revascularisation alone did not improve freedom from VT.