European journal of radiology · 2018
Influence of gantry rotation time and scan mode on image quality in ultra-high-resolution CT system.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Honda Osamu, Yanagawa Masahiro, Hata Akinori, Kikuchi Noriko, Miyata Tomo, Tsukagoshi Shinsuke, Uranishi Ayumi, Tomiyama Noriyuki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the image quality of helical scan (HS) mode and non-helical scan (non-HS) mode on ultra-high-resolution CT in different gantry rotation time.
METHODS: non-HS with 0.35 s/rot (non-HS200 mA/0.35 s). Three observers compared each non-HS image with HS image, and scored non-HS images by using 3-point scale, paying attention to normal findings, abnormal findings, noise, streak artifact, and overall image quality. Statistical analysis was performed with Steel-Dwass test.
RESULTS: Overall image quality (score: 2.45) and noise (score: 2.42) of non-HS 200 mA/1.5s was statistically best (p < 0.0005). Overall Image quality and noise of non-HS200 mA/0.75 s (score: 2.0) was comparable to that of HS200 mA/1.5 s. CTDIvol of HS200 mA/1.5 s is 23.2 mGy. CTDIvol of non-HS200 mA/1.5 s, non-HS200 mA/0.75 s, non-HS200 mA/0.35 s is 19.2 mGy, 9.8 mGy, 4.7 mGy.
CONCLUSION: Overall image quality and noise of non-helical scan is better than that of helical scan in the same rotation time. Overall Image quality of non-HS200 mA/0.75 s is comparable to that of HS200 mA/1.5 s, though the radiation dose of non-HS200 mA/0.75 s is lower than that of HS200 mA/1.5 s.
METHODS: non-HS with 0.35 s/rot (non-HS200 mA/0.35 s). Three observers compared each non-HS image with HS image, and scored non-HS images by using 3-point scale, paying attention to normal findings, abnormal findings, noise, streak artifact, and overall image quality. Statistical analysis was performed with Steel-Dwass test.
RESULTS: Overall image quality (score: 2.45) and noise (score: 2.42) of non-HS 200 mA/1.5s was statistically best (p < 0.0005). Overall Image quality and noise of non-HS200 mA/0.75 s (score: 2.0) was comparable to that of HS200 mA/1.5 s. CTDIvol of HS200 mA/1.5 s is 23.2 mGy. CTDIvol of non-HS200 mA/1.5 s, non-HS200 mA/0.75 s, non-HS200 mA/0.35 s is 19.2 mGy, 9.8 mGy, 4.7 mGy.
CONCLUSION: Overall image quality and noise of non-helical scan is better than that of helical scan in the same rotation time. Overall Image quality of non-HS200 mA/0.75 s is comparable to that of HS200 mA/1.5 s, though the radiation dose of non-HS200 mA/0.75 s is lower than that of HS200 mA/1.5 s.