Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2024
Outcomes by Retrospective Eligibility for Maintenance Therapy of Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Post Hoc Analysis of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 Trial.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование III фазыРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mamtani Ronac, Matsubara Nobuaki, Pino Alvaro Montesa, Herranz Urbano Anido, Şendur Mehmet A N, Gravis Gwenaelle, Huillard Olivier, Lee Hyo Jin, Gafanov Rustem, Joly Florence, Bedke Jens, Sella Avishay, Chang Yen-Hwa, Imai Kentaro, Moreno Blanca Homet, Xu Jin Zhi, Alva Ajjai, Powles Thomas
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 trial of first-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) completed enrollment before the approval of postchemotherapy maintenance avelumab for patients without progressive disease. This post hoc analysis evaluated the outcomes of patients who received chemotherapy alone in KEYNOTE-361 by retrospective eligibility for subsequent maintenance therapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in the chemotherapy alone arm were retrospectively categorized as maintenance eligible (received ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy and did not die or experience disease progression within 10 weeks of chemotherapy completion), maintenance ineligible (received <4 cycles of chemotherapy or had progressive disease or died within 0-10 weeks after completion of ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy), and indeterminate eligibility for maintenance therapy (if neither maintenance eligible or ineligible). End points included progression-free survival per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by blinded independent central review and overall survival from randomization (start of chemotherapy).
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 31.7 months (range, 22.0-42.3). Among 342 patients who received chemotherapy alone, 172 (50.3%) were maintenance eligible, 108 (31.6%) were maintenance ineligible, and 62 (18.1%) had indeterminate eligibility for maintenance therapy. The median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI 8.4-10.4) in maintenance-eligible patients, 5.1 months (4.2-6.0) in maintenance-ineligible patients, and 2.3 months (1.9-3.8) in the indeterminate group; median overall survival was 23.3 months (95% CI 19.4-26.1), 10.2 months (9.1-11.6), and 5.5 months (3.7-8.5), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis suggests that a majority of patients with untreated la/mUC who initiated chemotherapy in a clinical trial may have been considered eligible for maintenance therapy and had favorable survival outcomes compared with those considered maintenance ineligible.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in the chemotherapy alone arm were retrospectively categorized as maintenance eligible (received ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy and did not die or experience disease progression within 10 weeks of chemotherapy completion), maintenance ineligible (received <4 cycles of chemotherapy or had progressive disease or died within 0-10 weeks after completion of ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy), and indeterminate eligibility for maintenance therapy (if neither maintenance eligible or ineligible). End points included progression-free survival per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by blinded independent central review and overall survival from randomization (start of chemotherapy).
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 31.7 months (range, 22.0-42.3). Among 342 patients who received chemotherapy alone, 172 (50.3%) were maintenance eligible, 108 (31.6%) were maintenance ineligible, and 62 (18.1%) had indeterminate eligibility for maintenance therapy. The median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI 8.4-10.4) in maintenance-eligible patients, 5.1 months (4.2-6.0) in maintenance-ineligible patients, and 2.3 months (1.9-3.8) in the indeterminate group; median overall survival was 23.3 months (95% CI 19.4-26.1), 10.2 months (9.1-11.6), and 5.5 months (3.7-8.5), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis suggests that a majority of patients with untreated la/mUC who initiated chemotherapy in a clinical trial may have been considered eligible for maintenance therapy and had favorable survival outcomes compared with those considered maintenance ineligible.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansRetrospective StudiesMaleAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleAgedMiddle AgedMaintenance ChemotherapyCarcinoma, Transitional CellAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAged, 80 and overTreatment OutcomeProgression-Free SurvivalUrologic NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsEligibility Determination