International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2008
Infracoccygeal sacropexy for uterovaginal prolapse.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deffieux Xavier, Desseaux Krystel, de Tayrac Renaud, Faivre Erika, Frydman René, Fernandez Hervé
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To report on the efficacy and safety of infracoccygeal sacropexy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.
METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 87 women who underwent an infracoccygeal sacropexy procedure, 53 receiving a multifilament and 34 receiving a monofilament tape.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 27 months. Postoperative perineal pain was reported by 7 women (10%), and dyschesia and dyspareunia were observed de novo in 4 (5%) and 5 women (6%), respectively. There were 5 cases (9%) of vaginal extrusion and 9 cases (18%) of prolapse recurrence in the multifilament tape group, and in the monofilament tape group there were no cases of vaginal extrusion and 4 cases (14%) of prolapse recurrence (P=0.79 for prolapse recurrence). The recurrence-free survival curves of the 2 groups were similar. Univariate analysis revealed no independent factors of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Although infracoccygeal sacropexy was found to be associated with few prolapse recurrences, complications were not rare.
METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 87 women who underwent an infracoccygeal sacropexy procedure, 53 receiving a multifilament and 34 receiving a monofilament tape.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 27 months. Postoperative perineal pain was reported by 7 women (10%), and dyschesia and dyspareunia were observed de novo in 4 (5%) and 5 women (6%), respectively. There were 5 cases (9%) of vaginal extrusion and 9 cases (18%) of prolapse recurrence in the multifilament tape group, and in the monofilament tape group there were no cases of vaginal extrusion and 4 cases (14%) of prolapse recurrence (P=0.79 for prolapse recurrence). The recurrence-free survival curves of the 2 groups were similar. Univariate analysis revealed no independent factors of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Although infracoccygeal sacropexy was found to be associated with few prolapse recurrences, complications were not rare.