MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/sdi.70008

Медицинская библиотека · Seminars in dialysis · 2025

Comparing Concurrent and Countercurrent Dialysate Flow in Hemodialysis: A Pilot Study on Hyponatremic Patients.

Singh Amandeep, Pursnani Lalit, Mahapatra Himansu Sekhar, Balakrishna Muthukumar, Patil Sanket, Prabhakaran Manoj, Gautam Abhishek, Chakraborty Anubhav

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In hyponatremic patients, concurrent dialysate flow during hemodialysis may be an ideal option to mitigate complications such as osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS).

METHODS

Present randomized controlled trial enrolled dialysis-requiring chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) patients with serum sodium levels < 125 mEq/L during January 2020 over 16 months. Hemodynamically unstable patients, as well as those with a history of seizures and neurological conditions, were excluded. All were randomized to concurrent and countercurrent dialysate flow groups during two-h dialysis session. Hydration status was evaluated by Body Composition Monitor BCMTM and hourly sodium was estimated to guide ultrafiltration. Comparative analysis of sodium correction rates (meq/L/h) during dialysis, neurological deterioration via Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, and ODS during 1 week and 1 month in both groups was done. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare sodium correction trends.

RESULTS

A total of 44 hyponatremic patients of AKI (17.39%), CKD (56.52%) and acute on CKD (26.09%) were randomized to concurrent (n = 23) and countercurrent (n = 21) dialysate groups. Postdialysis sodium correction rate was nonsignificantly slower in the concurrent group (45.45%) vs. the countercurrent group (36.36% group, p = 0.44). Neurological deterioration, measured via MMSE scores, and ODS incidence were absent in both groups. The concurrent group exhibited a higher proportion of patients without neurological deterioration (73.91%) compared to the countercurrent group (57.14%, p = 0.241). Comparable survival between the two groups was seen at 10, 20, and 30 days. No significant risk factors for mortality were identified in either group.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent dialysate flow demonstrates a slower but nonsignificant rate of sodium correction, making it a safer alternative for managing severe hyponatremia during hemodialysis by reducing the risk of rapid neurological shifts.

Для цитирования: Singh Amandeep, Pursnani Lalit, Mahapatra Himansu Sekhar, Balakrishna Muthukumar, Patil Sanket, Prabhakaran Manoj, Gautam Abhishek, Chakraborty Anubhav. Comparing Concurrent and Countercurrent Dialysate Flow in Hemodialysis: A Pilot Study on Hyponatremic Patients.. Seminars in dialysis. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/sdi.70008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.