Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
Sonography versus anterior segment OCT for imaging bleb morphology after glaucoma drainage device surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schipper Pascal, Aretz Benjamin, Bourauel Leonie, Deubel Carolin, Petrak Michael, Holz Frank G, Liegl Raffael, Mercieca Karl, Liegl Constance
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The PAUL® Glaucoma Implant (PGI) is increasingly used in the surgical management of complex glaucoma, but detailed evaluation of its subconjunctival bleb morphology remains challenging due to its posterior location. While ultrasonography has long been used for bleb imaging, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) offers higher-resolution imaging of anterior structures. This study aimed to directly compare ultrasonography and AS-OCT in assessing bleb morphology following PGI implantation.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 20 patients (21 eyes) with PGI underwent postoperative assessment with both AS-OCT and B-scan ultrasonography. Bleb configuration (single- vs. double-layered), bleb height, and spatial extension were evaluated and compared between modalities.
RESULTS: Mean age was 64.0 years (SD = 16.6); 80% were male. Sonography identified double-layered blebs in 95.2% of eyes, compared to 47.7% with AS-OCT, which failed to fully visualize bleb layers in 38.1% of eyes. Sonography consistently measured greater bleb heights and lengths than AS-OCT (total bleb height 3.76 ± 1.39 mm vs. 1.77 ± 0.71 mm, p < 0.001; maximum bleb length 17.24 ± 3.17 mm vs. 2.85 ± 1.03 mm, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Sonography provided more comprehensive visualization of PGI blebs, particularly in detecting double-layered configurations, total height and measuring full posterior extension, whereas AS-OCT offered detailed anterior segment assessment including the tube entry site and patch graft. Both modalities yield complementary information, and their combined use may enhance postoperative monitoring and early detection of bleb dysfunction.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 20 patients (21 eyes) with PGI underwent postoperative assessment with both AS-OCT and B-scan ultrasonography. Bleb configuration (single- vs. double-layered), bleb height, and spatial extension were evaluated and compared between modalities.
RESULTS: Mean age was 64.0 years (SD = 16.6); 80% were male. Sonography identified double-layered blebs in 95.2% of eyes, compared to 47.7% with AS-OCT, which failed to fully visualize bleb layers in 38.1% of eyes. Sonography consistently measured greater bleb heights and lengths than AS-OCT (total bleb height 3.76 ± 1.39 mm vs. 1.77 ± 0.71 mm, p < 0.001; maximum bleb length 17.24 ± 3.17 mm vs. 2.85 ± 1.03 mm, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Sonography provided more comprehensive visualization of PGI blebs, particularly in detecting double-layered configurations, total height and measuring full posterior extension, whereas AS-OCT offered detailed anterior segment assessment including the tube entry site and patch graft. Both modalities yield complementary information, and their combined use may enhance postoperative monitoring and early detection of bleb dysfunction.