Journal of healthcare quality research · 2025
Cataract care process: Systematic review of clinical guidelines and synthesis of recommendations.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
García Anguas M, Seva-Llor A M, Cabrera Beyrouti R
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: In 2020, 94 million people worldwide had moderate to severe visual impairment or blindness due to cataracts, particularly among older adults. The allocation of resources and appropriate strategies are essential for effective healthcare management that can control costs and improve patients' quality of life. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) help reduce variability in care.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze, compare, and synthesize recommendations from multiple guidelines on the same topic in order to identify consistencies, discrepancies, and opportunities for improvement.
METHODS: Websites of international organizations, scientific societies, and various databases such as PubMed, WoS, and Cinahl were reviewed. A systematic review identified five high-quality CPGs for cataract management, with recommendations covering diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative follow-up.
RESULTS: Although some variability was found, common recommendations were identified. Two widely agreed upon recommendations stood out: avoiding routine preoperative medical tests for local anesthesia, as they do not reduce complications, and using intracameral antibiotics (cefuroxime/moxifloxacin) for infection prevention, supported by high-level evidence, among others. The guideline developed by the American Academy of Ophthalmology - Cataract in the Adult Eye Preferred Practice Pattern - was found to be the most valid and useful.
CONCLUSION: Standardizing high-evidence recommendations can improve clinical decision-making, reduce variability, and enhance patient outcomes. This study highlights the need for better implementation strategies and patient-centered education to improve adherence to care.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze, compare, and synthesize recommendations from multiple guidelines on the same topic in order to identify consistencies, discrepancies, and opportunities for improvement.
METHODS: Websites of international organizations, scientific societies, and various databases such as PubMed, WoS, and Cinahl were reviewed. A systematic review identified five high-quality CPGs for cataract management, with recommendations covering diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative follow-up.
RESULTS: Although some variability was found, common recommendations were identified. Two widely agreed upon recommendations stood out: avoiding routine preoperative medical tests for local anesthesia, as they do not reduce complications, and using intracameral antibiotics (cefuroxime/moxifloxacin) for infection prevention, supported by high-level evidence, among others. The guideline developed by the American Academy of Ophthalmology - Cataract in the Adult Eye Preferred Practice Pattern - was found to be the most valid and useful.
CONCLUSION: Standardizing high-evidence recommendations can improve clinical decision-making, reduce variability, and enhance patient outcomes. This study highlights the need for better implementation strategies and patient-centered education to improve adherence to care.