DOI 10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101161
Cataract care process: Systematic review of clinical guidelines and synthesis of recommendations.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
In 2020, 94 million people worldwide had moderate to severe visual impairment or blindness due to cataracts, particularly among older adults. The allocation of resources and appropriate strategies are essential for effective healthcare management that can control costs and improve patients' quality of life. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) help reduce variability in care.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze, compare, and synthesize recommendations from multiple guidelines on the same topic in order to identify consistencies, discrepancies, and opportunities for improvement.
METHODS
Websites of international organizations, scientific societies, and various databases such as PubMed, WoS, and Cinahl were reviewed. A systematic review identified five high-quality CPGs for cataract management, with recommendations covering diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative follow-up.
RESULTS
Although some variability was found, common recommendations were identified. Two widely agreed upon recommendations stood out: avoiding routine preoperative medical tests for local anesthesia, as they do not reduce complications, and using intracameral antibiotics (cefuroxime/moxifloxacin) for infection prevention, supported by high-level evidence, among others. The guideline developed by the American Academy of Ophthalmology - Cataract in the Adult Eye Preferred Practice Pattern - was found to be the most valid and useful.
CONCLUSION
Standardizing high-evidence recommendations can improve clinical decision-making, reduce variability, and enhance patient outcomes. This study highlights the need for better implementation strategies and patient-centered education to improve adherence to care.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.