MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305855

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2014

Respiratory mechanics during NCPAP and HHHFNC at equal distending pressures.

Lavizzari Anna, Veneroni Chiara, Colnaghi Mariarosa, Ciuffini Francesca, Zannin Emanuela, Fumagalli Monica, Mosca Fabio, Dellacà Raffaele L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) and nasal continuous positive airways pressure (NCPAP) on lung function and mechanics in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) at the same level of retropharyngeal pressure (Prp).

DESIGN

Randomised crossover trial.

SETTING

Neonatal intensive care unit, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

PATIENTS: 20 preterm infants (gestational age: 31±1 wks) with mild-moderate RDS requiring non-invasive respiratory support within 96 h after birth.

INTERVENTIONS: Infants were exposed to a randomised sequence of NCPAP and HHHFNC at different settings (2, 4 and 6 cmH₂O for NCPAP and 2, 4, 6 L/min for HHHFNC) to enable comparison at the same level of Prp.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tidal volume by respiratory inductance plethysmography, pleural pressure estimated by oesophageal pressure, and gas exchange were evaluated at each setting and used to compute breathing pattern parameters, lung mechanics and work of breathing (WOB).

RESULTS

A poor linear regression between flow and Prp was found during HHHFNC (Prp=0.3+0.7*flow; r²=0.37). Only in 15 out of 20 infants it was possible to compare HHHFNC and NCPAP at a Prp of 2 and 4 cmH₂O. No statistically significant differences were found in breathing pattern, gas exchange, lung mechanics and total WOB. Resistive WOB in the upper airways was slightly but significantly higher during HHHFNC (0.65 (0.49;1.09) vs 1.57 (0.85;2.09) cmH₂O median (IQR)).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differing mechanisms for generating positive airway pressure, when compared at the same Prp, NCPAP and HHHFNC provide similar effects on all the outcomes explored.

Для цитирования: Lavizzari Anna, Veneroni Chiara, Colnaghi Mariarosa, Ciuffini Francesca, Zannin Emanuela, Fumagalli Monica, Mosca Fabio, Dellacà Raffaele L. Respiratory mechanics during NCPAP and HHHFNC at equal distending pressures.. Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition. 2014. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305855.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.