The Laryngoscope · 2015
Impact of laryngologist and speech pathologist coassessment on outcomes and billing revenue.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Litts Juliana K, Gartner-Schmidt Jackie L, Clary Matthew S, Gillespie Amanda I
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study investigated financial and treatment implications of a speech-language pathologist (SLP) performing a voice evaluation at the initial laryngologic visit.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
METHODS: Medical records from 75 consecutive adult voice therapy patients during a 3-month period were categorized into two groups: group 1 (n = 37) represented patients who underwent a medical speech evaluation (MSE) at the initial voice assessment with the laryngologist (+SLP), and group 2 (n = 38) represented patients who did not receive an MSE (-SLP). Data collected included age, gender, voice diagnosis, number of therapy sessions attended and cancelled, reason for discharge, and pre- and post-voice therapy Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) scores.
RESULTS: Patients in the +SLP group had fewer cancellations (P = 0.001), greater change in VHI-10 from pre- to post-therapy (P = .001), and were more likely to be discharged from therapy having met therapeutic goals (P = .007) than patients in the -SLP group. In addition, lost revenue over 3 months due to cancellations/no-shows was $2,260 in the +SLP group compared to $7,030 in the -SLP group (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent voice evaluation by an SLP and laryngologist at initial diagnostic visit affects therapy attendance, voice therapy outcomes, and ultimately SLP and departmental billing revenue. Results may be due to more appropriate therapy referrals from SLP assessment of patients in conjunction with a laryngologist.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
METHODS: Medical records from 75 consecutive adult voice therapy patients during a 3-month period were categorized into two groups: group 1 (n = 37) represented patients who underwent a medical speech evaluation (MSE) at the initial voice assessment with the laryngologist (+SLP), and group 2 (n = 38) represented patients who did not receive an MSE (-SLP). Data collected included age, gender, voice diagnosis, number of therapy sessions attended and cancelled, reason for discharge, and pre- and post-voice therapy Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) scores.
RESULTS: Patients in the +SLP group had fewer cancellations (P = 0.001), greater change in VHI-10 from pre- to post-therapy (P = .001), and were more likely to be discharged from therapy having met therapeutic goals (P = .007) than patients in the -SLP group. In addition, lost revenue over 3 months due to cancellations/no-shows was $2,260 in the +SLP group compared to $7,030 in the -SLP group (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent voice evaluation by an SLP and laryngologist at initial diagnostic visit affects therapy attendance, voice therapy outcomes, and ultimately SLP and departmental billing revenue. Results may be due to more appropriate therapy referrals from SLP assessment of patients in conjunction with a laryngologist.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.