Urology · 2015
Intralesional Injections for Early Peyronie Disease: Standardized Assessment and Analysis of Predictive Factors for Treatment Response.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wolff Benoit, Peyronnet Benoit, Cattarino Susanna, Mozer Pierre, Renard-Penna Raphaële, Phé Véronique, Bitker Marc-Olivier, Rouprêt Morgan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of a new protocol of intralesional injections of verapamil (ILIV) to treat Peyronie disease (PD) and to look for predictors of response.
METHODS: Patients followed up for PD in our center were prospectively enrolled between 2007 and 2013. The following data were collected: age, degree of curvature of the penis, Lue score (severity score of PD [0-15]), and pain (analogic Likert scale: 0-5). The protocol consisted of 1 verapamil injection per session (15 mg in 6 mL) in the main plaque using a single-puncture approach. Injections were repeated once every 3 weeks, at least 6 times.
RESULTS: Sixty men were included. Mean number of injections per patient was 12.6 (±8.9). Average Lue scores before and after ILIV were 9.4 (±2) and 4.5 (±2; P = .05), respectively. Average penile curvatures during erection before and after ILIV were 37.3° (±13.3) and 21° (±13), respectively (P = .02). There were no serious side effects. At the end of follow-up, 47 patients (78%) considered themselves globally improved. Younger age was the only predictor of response to ILIV in univariate (odds ratio = 0.91; P = .04) and multivariate analyses (odds ratio = 0.87; P = .03).
CONCLUSION: ILIV had a favorable impact reducing PD in 78% of patients with minimal side effects. Most patients required at least 12 injections to obtain optimal improvement. A protocol consisting of repeated courses of 6 injections using a single-puncture approach appears a valid option. Younger age was the only predictor of success.
METHODS: Patients followed up for PD in our center were prospectively enrolled between 2007 and 2013. The following data were collected: age, degree of curvature of the penis, Lue score (severity score of PD [0-15]), and pain (analogic Likert scale: 0-5). The protocol consisted of 1 verapamil injection per session (15 mg in 6 mL) in the main plaque using a single-puncture approach. Injections were repeated once every 3 weeks, at least 6 times.
RESULTS: Sixty men were included. Mean number of injections per patient was 12.6 (±8.9). Average Lue scores before and after ILIV were 9.4 (±2) and 4.5 (±2; P = .05), respectively. Average penile curvatures during erection before and after ILIV were 37.3° (±13.3) and 21° (±13), respectively (P = .02). There were no serious side effects. At the end of follow-up, 47 patients (78%) considered themselves globally improved. Younger age was the only predictor of response to ILIV in univariate (odds ratio = 0.91; P = .04) and multivariate analyses (odds ratio = 0.87; P = .03).
CONCLUSION: ILIV had a favorable impact reducing PD in 78% of patients with minimal side effects. Most patients required at least 12 injections to obtain optimal improvement. A protocol consisting of repeated courses of 6 injections using a single-puncture approach appears a valid option. Younger age was the only predictor of success.