COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTICS AND TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 MYOPIC CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION AFTER ANTIVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY.

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes of Type 1 and Type 2 myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) after 1 year of antivascular endothelial growth factors therapy and identify clinical factors associated with visual outcomes, recurrence rates, and injection numbers.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed 171 patients with active myopic CNV treated with antivascular endothelial growth factors therapy and followed for at least 1 year. CNV types were classified using optical coherence tomography. Baseline characteristics, including best-corrected visual acuity, myopic maculopathy grade, and optical coherence tomography findings, were compared.

RESULTS

Type 1 CNVs (19.3% of cases) exhibited worse baseline best-corrected visual acuity and more advanced macular degeneration than Type 2 CNVs. Both types showed significant visual improvement equivalent to 2.2 lines post-therapy, with no difference in recurrence rates or injection numbers. Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline best-corrected visual acuity, severity of myopic macular degeneration, and presence of subretinal hyperreflective exudation were significant predictors of final best-corrected visual acuity, while CNV type was not an independent predictor.

CONCLUSION

Despite more severe macular degeneration in Type 1 CNV, both types myopic CNVs benefit significantly from antivascular endothelial growth factors therapy. These findings support extending treatment to Type 1 CNVs and highlight the need for individualized management strategies.