MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0093-934x(86)90046-5

Медицинская библиотека · Brain and language · 1986

Making reference: the cohesive use of pronouns in the narrative discourse of hemidecorticate adolescents.

Lovett M W, Dennis M, Newman J E

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The cohesive use of referential language in narrative production reveals communicative goals as well as specific aspects of language use. A formalism for analyzing pronominal cohesion was developed and applied to the narrative discourse of three hemidecorticate adolescents. The results revealed hemisphere-dependent differences in overall narrative skill as well as distinct individual discourse strategies. Neither left hemidecorticate planned narration in extended discourse units: One demonstrated a linear and highly explicit discourse style with redundant over-statement of referent nouns and the other produced narratives cluttered with pronouns of both correct and ambiguous reference, relying on nonpersonal pronouns at considerable cost to narrative specificity. The right hemidecorticate produced narratives that were more economical in form and richer in content: He was the only subject able to maintain simultaneous story lines with multiple pronouns and referential relationships cohesively embedded. All subjects expressed at least some story content, but only the right hemidecorticate narratives conveyed suggestion and implication as well as explicit statement.

Для цитирования: Lovett M W, Dennis M, Newman J E. Making reference: the cohesive use of pronouns in the narrative discourse of hemidecorticate adolescents.. Brain and language. 1986. DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(86)90046-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.