[Long-term outcome of incontinence and prolapse surgery at the Heidelberg University Gynecologic Clinic 1980-1992].

OBJECTIVE

Long-term results after different types of operations for urinary stress incontinence (minimum follow-up: 18 months) as well as multiple risk factors for the pelvic floor were analysed in a retrospective study.

STUDY

DESIGN

Between 1980 and 1992 1283 patients underwent surgery because of urinary stress incontinence at the University Women's Hospital in Heidelberg. The data of 478 patients, 430 of these after primary and 48 after recurrent surgery, were evaluated by questionnaires with regard to the long-term-results.

RESULTS

57% of patients after primary surgical therapy and 37% after recurrent surgery were cured for longer than 5 years or since the operation. A cure or improvement of the incontinence could be observed in 80% after primary and in 73% after recurrent surgery. Among the vaginal approaches for primary surgery the hysterectomy combined with colporrhaphy was most successful (60% cured or more than 5 years continent, 80.5% at least improved). The Burch colposuspension revealed even better results among the abdominal approaches (64% cured or longer than 5 years continent, 86% at least improved) compared to the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure with a cure rate of 33%. For therapy of the recurrent urinary incontinence the abdominal Burch colposuspension showed the best results with cure rates of 50% and cure or improvement in 75%. Therefore the abdominal approach seems to be superior to vaginal techniques such as sling operations (33% cure rate, 67% at least improved) or only re-colporrhaphy (27% cure rate, 78% at least improved).

CONCLUSION

For primary incontinence the hysterectomy with vaginal repair or the Burch colposuspension have proved to be most successful. For recurrent urinary incontinence the abdominal colposuspension (Burch procedure) seems to be superior to other approaches.