MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1028-4559(10)60034-4

Медицинская библиотека · Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2010

Insertion of the Mirena intrauterine system for treatment of adenomyosis-associated menorrhagia: a novel method.

Peng Fu-Shaing, Wu Ming-Yih, Yang Jehn-Hsiahn, Chen Shee-Uan, Ho Hong-Nerng, Yang Yu-Shih

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system Mirena is difficult in women with adenomyosis, and the device is often subsequently expelled. We used a novel insertion technique (Yang's method) to overcome this problem.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 273 patients with adenomyosis who were receiving Mirena for treatment of menorrhagia and/or dysmenorrhea between 2001 and 2008. Clinical outcomes and expulsion rates were compared between patients treated using conventional insertion and those treated using Yang's insertion methods.

RESULTS

Expulsion occurred in 25.3% of patients with the conventional method, compared with 10.2% of patients with Yang's method. Hemoglobin levels and dysmenorrhea improved greatly in both groups after Mirena insertion.

CONCLUSION

Yang's insertion method for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is more reliable in some difficult cases, such as patients with severe adenomyosis. This method ensures correct positioning, thus reducing the risks of uterine perforation and/or expulsion.

Для цитирования: Peng Fu-Shaing, Wu Ming-Yih, Yang Jehn-Hsiahn, Chen Shee-Uan, Ho Hong-Nerng, Yang Yu-Shih. Insertion of the Mirena intrauterine system for treatment of adenomyosis-associated menorrhagia: a novel method.. Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/s1028-4559(10)60034-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.