Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2006
Evaluation of periapical repair following retrograde filling with different root-end filling materials in dog teeth with periapical lesions.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tanomaru-Filho Mário, Luis Marcone R, Leonardo Mario R, Tanomaru Juliane M G, Silva Léa A B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate periapical repair following retrograde filling using different root-end filling materials.
STUDY DESIGN: After induction of periapical lesions, 48 root canals from dog teeth were partially filled. Endodontic surgery was performed and 3 different materials were used for root-end filling: Sealer 26, Sealapex plus zinc oxide, or mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). No additional procedures were performed in the control group after partial filling of the root canal. After 180 days, the animals were killed, the maxillas and mandibles were removed, and specimens were submitted for histologic processing.
RESULTS: Histopathologic analysis revealed similar periapical repair for the groups in which Sealer 26, Sealapex plus zinc oxide, and MTA were used (P > .05). The control group showed unsatisfactory periapical repair (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in periapical tissue healing after retrograde filling with the tested materials, which indicates that these 3 root-end filling materials are equally useful.
STUDY DESIGN: After induction of periapical lesions, 48 root canals from dog teeth were partially filled. Endodontic surgery was performed and 3 different materials were used for root-end filling: Sealer 26, Sealapex plus zinc oxide, or mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). No additional procedures were performed in the control group after partial filling of the root canal. After 180 days, the animals were killed, the maxillas and mandibles were removed, and specimens were submitted for histologic processing.
RESULTS: Histopathologic analysis revealed similar periapical repair for the groups in which Sealer 26, Sealapex plus zinc oxide, and MTA were used (P > .05). The control group showed unsatisfactory periapical repair (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in periapical tissue healing after retrograde filling with the tested materials, which indicates that these 3 root-end filling materials are equally useful.