Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2015
Office-Based Photoangiolytic Laser Treatment of Reinke's Edema: Safety and Voice Outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koszewski Ian J, Hoffman Matthew R, Young W Greg, Lai Ying-Ta, Dailey Seth H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and voice outcomes of office-based photoangiolytic laser treatment of Reinke's edema.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing office-based laser treatment of endoscopy-proven Reinke's edema. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by reviewing complications. Voice outcomes were analyzed by comparing pre- and postprocedural acoustic, aerodynamic, and Voice Handicap Index measurements. Complete data sets were not available for all subjects; sample size for each parameter is reported with the corresponding result.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients met inclusion criteria. There were no minor or major complications. Five procedures were truncated due to patient intolerance. Phonatory frequency range increased (n = 12, P = .003), while percent jitter decreased (n = 12, P = .004). Phonation threshold pressure decreased after treatment (n = 4, P = .049). Voice Handicap Index also decreased (n = 14, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest series of patients undergoing office-based photoangiolytic laser treatment specifically for Reinke's edema. Our data suggest that this is a safe and effective modality to treat dysphonia associated with Reinke's edema, although patient intolerance of the procedure may represent a barrier.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing office-based laser treatment of endoscopy-proven Reinke's edema. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by reviewing complications. Voice outcomes were analyzed by comparing pre- and postprocedural acoustic, aerodynamic, and Voice Handicap Index measurements. Complete data sets were not available for all subjects; sample size for each parameter is reported with the corresponding result.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients met inclusion criteria. There were no minor or major complications. Five procedures were truncated due to patient intolerance. Phonatory frequency range increased (n = 12, P = .003), while percent jitter decreased (n = 12, P = .004). Phonation threshold pressure decreased after treatment (n = 4, P = .049). Voice Handicap Index also decreased (n = 14, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest series of patients undergoing office-based photoangiolytic laser treatment specifically for Reinke's edema. Our data suggest that this is a safe and effective modality to treat dysphonia associated with Reinke's edema, although patient intolerance of the procedure may represent a barrier.