MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/gigascience/giag057

Медицинская библиотека · GigaScience · 2026

Comparative evaluation of gene selection approaches in transcriptomics: bias correction and visualization with TransPro.

Yu Dongyue, Li Chen, Yan Shuo, Guo Lujiale, Liang Jingyu, Chen Shengquan, Bu Wenjun

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Differential gene selection is fundamental to transcriptomics; however, mainstream methods typically fit each gene independently via marginal analyses. Although multifactor designs can be accommodated, gene-gene interactions are not explicitly modeled, rendering results susceptible to systematic bias driven by coexpression patterns. Additionally, heterogeneous tools, inconsistent metrics, and fragmented workflows compromise the reproducibility and interpretability of downstream enrichment and visualization analyses.

FINDINGS: We developed TransPro, an open-source integrated framework comprising 2 complementary packages, TransProPy and TransProR, for systematic benchmarking, bias correction, and reproducible visualization in differential gene selection. TransProPy (Python) combines multivariate AUC-based complementarity quantification with ensemble learning for interaction-aware gene selection, whereas TransProR (R) provides standardized differential analysis, pathway enrichment, and 7 visualization workflows (circular dendrograms, chord diagrams, spiral plots, and interaction networks). Cross-dataset generalizability was assessed using 12 independent datasets spanning multiple cancer types and normal tissues with broad heterogeneity in data origin, platform, batch structure, and sample size. Under stringent thresholds, positively and negatively correlated genes maintained a near-equal proportion at the gene level, and activated and suppressed pathway proportions exhibited good concordance with gene-level correlation patterns; critically, TransProPy produced meaningful enrichment results under conditions where conventional methods failed. Quantitative comparisons of core-enriched gene proportions further supported these differences (Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Wilcoxon tests, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TransPro establishes a unified, reproducible framework that corrects method-specific biases while bridging computational discovery and biological interpretation. All code, workflows, documentation, and example data are openly accessible to support reproducibility and community reuse.

Для цитирования: Yu Dongyue, Li Chen, Yan Shuo, Guo Lujiale, Liang Jingyu, Chen Shengquan, Bu Wenjun. Comparative evaluation of gene selection approaches in transcriptomics: bias correction and visualization with TransPro.. GigaScience. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giag057.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.