MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000371511

Медицинская библиотека · Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015

Positive reactions to nickel on a patch test do not predict clinical outcome of nickel alloy-based atrial septal defect occluder implantation.

Kim Hee Joo, Shin Jung U, Lee Jungsoo, Lee Hemin, Jin Shan, Kim Seo Hyeong, Noh Ji Yeon, Lee Kwang Hoon

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patch testing is thought to be necessary prior to metal device implantation to rule out metal allergy-related complications; however, there are controversies over the effects of nickel allergy on the outcome of nickel alloy-based device implantation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the adverse events in a Korean population of nickel allergy patients who underwent atrial septal defect (ASD) closure with a nickel-titanium alloy-based device.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ASD closure with a nitinol device.

RESULTS

Among 38 patients who had ASD closure, 4 of 5 nickel-allergic patients and 10 of the 33 non-nickel-allergic patients had post-closure complications. All patients fared well, without device failure culminating in device removal.

CONCLUSION

In this study, positive reactions to nickel in a patch test were not associated with adverse early or late outcomes following ASD closure with a nickel alloy-based device.

Для цитирования: Kim Hee Joo, Shin Jung U, Lee Jungsoo, Lee Hemin, Jin Shan, Kim Seo Hyeong, Noh Ji Yeon, Lee Kwang Hoon. Positive reactions to nickel on a patch test do not predict clinical outcome of nickel alloy-based atrial septal defect occluder implantation.. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 2015. DOI: 10.1159/000371511.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.