The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Silverberg Noah D, Iverson Grant L, ACRM Brain Injury Special Interest Group Mild TBI Task Force members:, Cogan Alison, Dams-O-Connor Kristen, Delmonico Richard, Graf Min Jeong P, Iaccarino Mary Alexis, Kajankova Maria, Kamins Joshua, McCulloch Karen L, McKinney Gary, Nagele Drew, Panenka William J, Rabinowitz Amanda R, Reed Nick, Wethe Jennifer V, Whitehair Victoria, ACRM Mild TBI Diagnostic Criteria Expert Consensus Group:, Anderson Vicki, Arciniegas David B, Bayley Mark T, Bazarian Jeffery J, Bell Kathleen R, Broglio Steven P, Cifu David, Davis Gavin A, Dvorak Jiri, Echemendia Ruben J, Gioia Gerard A, Giza Christopher C, Hinds Sidney R, Katz Douglas I, Kurowski Brad G, Leddy John J, Sage Natalie Le, Lumba-Brown Angela, Maas Andrew Ir, Manley Geoffrey T, McCrea Michael, Menon David K, Ponsford Jennie, Putukian Margot, Suskauer Stacy J, van der Naalt Joukje, Walker William C, Yeates Keith Owen, Zafonte Ross, Zasler Nathan D, Zemek Roger
Аннотация
DESIGN: Rapid evidence reviews on 12 clinical questions and Delphi method for expert consensus.
PARTICIPANTS: The Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Task Force of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Brain Injury Special Interest Group convened a Working Group of 17 members and an external interdisciplinary expert panel of 32 clinician-scientists. Public stakeholder feedback was analyzed from 68 individuals and 23 organizations.
RESULTS: The first 2 Delphi votes asked the expert panel to rate their agreement with both the diagnostic criteria for mild TBI and the supporting evidence statements. In the first round, 10 of 12 evidence statements reached consensus agreement. Revised evidence statements underwent a second round of expert panel voting, where consensus was achieved for all. For the diagnostic criteria, the final agreement rate, after the third vote, was 90.7%. Public stakeholder feedback was incorporated into the diagnostic criteria revision prior to the third expert panel vote. A terminology question was added to the third round of Delphi voting, where 30 of 32 (93.8%) expert panel members agreed that 'the diagnostic label 'concussion' may be used interchangeably with 'mild TBI' when neuroimaging is normal or not clinically indicated.'
CONCLUSIONS: New diagnostic criteria for mild TBI were developed through an evidence review and expert consensus process. Having unified diagnostic criteria for mild TBI can improve the quality and consistency of mild TBI research and clinical care.