MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2004.04.017

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical radiology · 2004

Assessing the impact of CAD on the sensitivity and specificity of film readers.

Taylor P, Given-Wilson R, Champness J, Potts H W W, Johnston K

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To assess the impact of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompts on film readers' sensitivity and specificity.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Thirty-five readers read 120 films, including 44 cancers, 40 of which were prompted. All readers looked at all cases with and without prompts. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each reader under each condition.

RESULTS

The sensitivity improved when CAD prompts were used (0.80 from 0.77). The difference was slightly below the threshold for statistical significance (95% CI for the difference is -0.0027-0.064). The specificity also improved (0.86 from 0.85), but not significantly. There was a significant improvement in sensitivity when readers' judgements were combined to simulate double reading, from 0.77 to 0.81. (95% CI for the difference is 0.014-0.077).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of prompted cancers that readers did and did not recall, found that cases were more likely to be correctly recalled if there were emphasized prompts, more prompts or if the case was harder. There was no statistically significant effect for type of abnormality or tumour size or for the performance, attitude or experience of the reader.

Для цитирования: Taylor P, Given-Wilson R, Champness J, Potts H W W, Johnston K. Assessing the impact of CAD on the sensitivity and specificity of film readers.. Clinical radiology. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.04.017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.