DOI 10.3390/diagnostics14202291
Interpretable Clinical Decision-Making Application for Etiological Diagnosis of Ventricular Tachycardia Based on Machine Learning.
Аннотация
Background
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) can broadly be categorised into ischemic heart disease, non-ischemic structural heart disease, and idiopathic VT. There are few studies related to the application of machine learning for the etiological diagnosis of VT, and the interpretable methods are still in the exploratory stage for clinical decision-making applications.
Objectives
The aim is to propose a machine learning model for the etiological diagnosis of VT. Interpretable results based on models are compared with expert knowledge, and interpretable evaluation protocols for clinical decision-making applications are developed.
Methods
A total of 1305 VT patient data from 1 January 2013 to 1 September 2023 at the Arrhythmia Centre of Fuwai Hospital were included in the study. Clinical data collected during hospitalisation included demographics, medical history, vital signs, echocardiographic results, and laboratory test outcomes.
Results
The XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance in VT etiological diagnosis (precision, recall, and F1 were 88.4%, 88.5%, and 88.4%, respectively). A total of four interpretable machine learning methods applicable to clinical decision-making were evaluated in terms of visualisation, clinical usability, clinical applicability, and efficiency with expert knowledge interpretation.
Conclusions
The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance in the etiological diagnosis of VT, and SHAP and decision tree interpretable methods are more favoured by clinicians for decision-making.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.