MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00481-x

Медицинская библиотека · Obstetrics and gynecology · 1997

A simplified protocol for pessary management.

Wu V, Farrell S A, Baskett T F, Flowerdew G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a simplified protocol for pessary management.

METHODS

Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse who opted for pessaries were enrolled in a prospective simplified protocol for pessary management. After the initial pessary fitting, they were seen at 2 weeks for reexamination and thereafter at 3- to 6-month intervals.

RESULTS

One hundred ten women (mean age 65 years) were enrolled, and 81 (74%) of them were fitted successfully with a pessary. Life-table analysis showed that 66% of those who used a pessary for more than 1 month were still users after 12 months and 53% were still users after 36 months. The severity of pelvic prolapse did not predict the likelihood of pessary failure except in cases of complete vaginal eversion. Patients complaining of stress incontinence were less likely to have a successful pessary fitting and more likely to opt for surgery. Current hormone use and substantial perineal support do not predict greater likelihood of pessary fitting success. No serious complications from using the pessary were observed in the study sample.

CONCLUSION

Stringent guidelines calling for frequent pelvic examinations during pessary use can be relaxed safely. Pessaries can be offered as a safe long-term option for the management of pelvic prolapse.

Для цитирования: Wu V, Farrell S A, Baskett T F, Flowerdew G. A simplified protocol for pessary management.. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1997. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00481-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.