Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2000
Photoscratch testing in systemic drug-induced photosensitivity.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Conilleau V, Dompmartin A, Michel M, Verneuil L, Leroy D
Аннотация
Because of numerous false-negative results, photopatch testing is seldom relevant in systemic drug-induced photosensitivity. These false-negative photopatch test results can be attributed to the inability of the drug to penetrate into the epidermis. In order to enhance the penetration of the tested drug into the epidermis, some authors proposed to breach the cutaneous barrier. We performed a prospective study comparing photopatch and photoscratch testing. Fifteen patients presenting with a systemic drug-induced photosensitivity, proved by a favourable outcome after discontinuing the drug, were tested. For each drug, photopatch and photoscratch tests were performed. Two-thirds of the patients had negative photopatch and photoscratch tests with the suspected drugs. Photopatch and photoscratch tests were positive and relevant, respectively, in 3 and 4 patients. Photoscratch tests induced more false-positive results due to irritation confirmed on control subjects. Our study proves that photoscratch tests do not change the sensitivity of phototesting.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAntipsychotic AgentsDermatitis, IrritantDrug EruptionsEpidermisErythemaFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleFenofibrateFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypolipidemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPhenothiazinesPhotosensitivity DisordersProspective StudiesRadiation DosageSensitivity and SpecificitySkin AbsorptionSkin Tests