MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/icvts/ivaf156

Медицинская библиотека · Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025

Outcomes following extended thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Type B aortic dissection from the global registry for endovascular aortic treatment.

Allievi Sara, Mandigers Tim J, Weaver Fred A, Azizzadeh Ali, Piffaretti Gabriele, Schermerhorn Marc L, Magee Gregory A, Gable Dennis R, Lomazzi Chiara, Trimarchi Santi

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the short- to longer-term safety and efficacy of extended thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Type B aortic dissection.

METHODS

We identified acute and subacute Type B dissection between 2010 and 2016 in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment. We stratified the population based on treatment extent: 'non-extended' (1 stent graft deployed), 'extended' (>1 stent graft deployed). Our primary outcomes were in-hospital spinal cord ischaemia and mortality. Secondarily, we evaluated procedure-related complications (endoleak, migration, fracture, compression, reinterventions), sac dynamics, rupture, and all-cause mortality at 1 and 5 years. Sensitivity analysis was performed in patients without prior aortic procedures.

RESULTS

Of 170 procedures, 78 (46%) were extended (median 2 [range 2-5] stent-grafts). Extended and non-extended treatment had similar rates of complicated presentations (53% vs 64%; P = 0.13). Compared with non-extended treatment, extended treatment had similar in-hospital rates of spinal cord ischaemia (2.6% vs 2.2%; P = 1) and mortality (2.6% vs 2.2%, P = 1). Additionally, extended treatment had not statistically different sac expansion rates, (1 year: 14% vs 23%, P =0.80; 5 years: 16% vs 32%, P=0.29) and rupture risk (1 year: 1.3% vs 3.3%, P = 0.63), similar procedure-related complications (endoleak, migration, fracture, compression, reinterventions; all P > 0.05) and all-cause mortality (1 year: 10% vs 7.6%, P=0.54; 5 years: 19% vs 21%, P=0.82). All outcomes remained similar on sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that extended treatment for Type B aortic dissection may be associated with similar procedure-related risks and complications. Future larger studies are needed to define who might benefit from an extended treatment and further optimize patient-specific treatment for aortic dissection.

Для цитирования: Allievi Sara, Mandigers Tim J, Weaver Fred A, Azizzadeh Ali, Piffaretti Gabriele, Schermerhorn Marc L, Magee Gregory A, Gable Dennis R, Lomazzi Chiara, Trimarchi Santi. Outcomes following extended thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Type B aortic dissection from the global registry for endovascular aortic treatment.. Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf156.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.