Renal Biomarkers and Prognosis in HFpEF and HFrEF: The Role of Albuminuria and eGFR-A Systematic Review.

Background and

Objectives

Heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently coexist and are closely interrelated, significantly affecting clinical outcomes. Among CKD-related markers, albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) have emerged as key prognostic indicators in HF. However, their specific predictive value across different HF phenotypes-namely HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)-remains incompletely understood. This systematic review aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of albuminuria and eGFR in patients with HF and to compare their predictive roles in HFpEF versus HFrEF populations. Materials and

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of major databases to identify clinical studies evaluating the association between albuminuria, eGFR, and adverse outcomes in HF patients. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies reporting on cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, or HF-related hospitalizations, with subgroup analyses based on ejection fraction. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers.

Results

Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, including diverse HF populations and various biomarker assessment methods. Both albuminuria and reduced eGFR were consistently associated with increased risk of mortality and hospitalization. In HFrEF populations, reduced eGFR demonstrated stronger prognostic associations, whereas albuminuria was predictive across both HF phenotypes. Heterogeneity in study design and outcome definitions limited comparability.

Conclusions

Albuminuria and eGFR are valuable prognostic biomarkers in HF and may enhance risk stratification and clinical decision-making, particularly when integrated into clinical assessment models. Differential prognostic implications in HFpEF versus HFrEF highlight the need for phenotype-specific approaches. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and clarify their role in guiding personalized therapeutic strategies in HF populations. The current evidence base consists primarily of observational studies with variable methodological quality and inconsistent reporting of effect estimates.