DOI 10.1007/s00103-019-02975-1
[Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in women and men in Germany from 1997-1999 and from 2008-2011-Trend analysis with two national health population surveys].
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The benefit of medicines in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) has been demonstrated in women and men. However, gender-specific differences have been observed in the prescription of these medicines. Information on trends in prevalence use in women and men from population-based studies are still lacking.
METHODS
Data of people aged 40-79 years with CHD from the national health interview and examination surveys for adults in Germany from 1997-1999 (GNHIES98, n = 411) and from 2008-2011 (DEGS1, n = 440) were analyzed. Trend analyses via multivariable regression models, taking into account relevant covariables, were used to calculate the prevalence of medicine use in secondary prevention of CHD between GNHIES98 and DEGS1. The following groups were considered: antiplatelet, statins, beta-receptor blockers, agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (RAS blocker), calcium-channel blockers, and nitrate.
RESULTS
In one decade, the prevalence had increased for antiplatelet (24.0% vs. 59.6%), statins (18.5% vs. 56.2%), beta-receptor blockers (24.7% vs. 65.5%), and RAS blockers (31.6% vs. 69.0%). The prevalence of calcium-channel blockers (33.3% vs. 20.5%) and nitrate (40.6% vs. 10.1%) had decreased. In GNHIES98, men were more likely to use RAS blockers. Significant gender differences were found in DEGS1 only for angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
CONCLUSION
This study showed an improvement in the use of drugs for the secondary prevention of CHD in both sexes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.