Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology · 2011
[Modified urethral pull-through procedure for posterior urethral stricture or atresia].
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xie Qing-xiang, Hang Cong-xiang, Zhao Li, Huang Hong-wei, Lin Xia-cong, Xie Zhi-ming, Hu Zhi, Zhu Xian-zhong, Xu Wei-jie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the modified urethral pull-through procedure for the treatment of posterior urethral stricture or atresia.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 212 cases of posterior urethral stricture or atresia treated by the modified urethral pull-through procedure. The length of the stricture or atresia was 1.5 - 12 cm, and 66 cases had experienced 1 - 4 previous unsuccessful urethral repairs. Simple transperineal approach was adopted in 208 cases and transperineal-inferiorpubic approach in the other 4. And 15 of the patients underwent urethral construction with grafts.
RESULTS: Satisfactory voiding was achieved in 198 (93.4%) of the patients, of whom 16 received 3 - 15 urethral dilations. Of the 14 cases that failed, 10 succeeded after a second and 2 after a third operation. Of the 15 cases that underwent substitution urethroplasty, 14 achieved satisfactory voiding, and only 1 needed repeat dilation. No serious complications were observed in any of the patients.
CONCLUSION: Modified urethral pull-through procedure, with its advantages of safety, mini-invasiveness, simple operation and high success rate, is feasible for the treatment of posterior urethral stricture or atresia, while for that with the length >5 cm, substitution urethroplasty should be considered.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 212 cases of posterior urethral stricture or atresia treated by the modified urethral pull-through procedure. The length of the stricture or atresia was 1.5 - 12 cm, and 66 cases had experienced 1 - 4 previous unsuccessful urethral repairs. Simple transperineal approach was adopted in 208 cases and transperineal-inferiorpubic approach in the other 4. And 15 of the patients underwent urethral construction with grafts.
RESULTS: Satisfactory voiding was achieved in 198 (93.4%) of the patients, of whom 16 received 3 - 15 urethral dilations. Of the 14 cases that failed, 10 succeeded after a second and 2 after a third operation. Of the 15 cases that underwent substitution urethroplasty, 14 achieved satisfactory voiding, and only 1 needed repeat dilation. No serious complications were observed in any of the patients.
CONCLUSION: Modified urethral pull-through procedure, with its advantages of safety, mini-invasiveness, simple operation and high success rate, is feasible for the treatment of posterior urethral stricture or atresia, while for that with the length >5 cm, substitution urethroplasty should be considered.