Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research · 2009
Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Denizoğlu Saip, Hanyaloğlu Cem S, Aksakal Bünyamin
Аннотация
AIMS: To evaluate the effects of two different surface treatments and bonding agents on tensile bond strength between a Co-Cr and a Ni-Cr cast alloy and two resin-luting cements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and forty alloy samples were cast and subjected to surface treatments such as sandblasting, chemical etching, and sandblasting plus chemical etching. Panavia F and CandB cement were used as cementing mediums. The etching qualities were examined by a stereooptic microscope. Failure surfaces were examined throughout scanning electron microscopy. The data were evaluated using statistical methods, namely analysis of variance and multiple comparison test (Tukey HSD).
RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the bonding provided by the various cements (P < 0.001) and also type of surface treatments (P < 0.001). For all groups, sandblasted surfaces showed the highest bond strength values. There was no significant difference between the Cr-Co and the Cr-Ni alloys (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Panavia F showed higher tensile strength and the sandblasted samples possessed higher tensile strength.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and forty alloy samples were cast and subjected to surface treatments such as sandblasting, chemical etching, and sandblasting plus chemical etching. Panavia F and CandB cement were used as cementing mediums. The etching qualities were examined by a stereooptic microscope. Failure surfaces were examined throughout scanning electron microscopy. The data were evaluated using statistical methods, namely analysis of variance and multiple comparison test (Tukey HSD).
RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the bonding provided by the various cements (P < 0.001) and also type of surface treatments (P < 0.001). For all groups, sandblasted surfaces showed the highest bond strength values. There was no significant difference between the Cr-Co and the Cr-Ni alloys (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Panavia F showed higher tensile strength and the sandblasted samples possessed higher tensile strength.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acid Etching, DentalAdhesivenessAluminum OxideBoron CompoundsChromium AlloysCobaltComposite ResinsDental AlloysDental BondingDental EtchingDental PolishingHumansMaterials TestingMethacrylatesMethylmethacrylatesMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNickelResin CementsStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesTemperatureTensile StrengthTime FactorsWater