MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0970-9290.52896

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research · 2009

Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments.

Denizoğlu Saip, Hanyaloğlu Cem S, Aksakal Bünyamin

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS: To evaluate the effects of two different surface treatments and bonding agents on tensile bond strength between a Co-Cr and a Ni-Cr cast alloy and two resin-luting cements.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Two hundred and forty alloy samples were cast and subjected to surface treatments such as sandblasting, chemical etching, and sandblasting plus chemical etching. Panavia F and CandB cement were used as cementing mediums. The etching qualities were examined by a stereooptic microscope. Failure surfaces were examined throughout scanning electron microscopy. The data were evaluated using statistical methods, namely analysis of variance and multiple comparison test (Tukey HSD).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in the bonding provided by the various cements (P < 0.001) and also type of surface treatments (P < 0.001). For all groups, sandblasted surfaces showed the highest bond strength values. There was no significant difference between the Cr-Co and the Cr-Ni alloys (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Panavia F showed higher tensile strength and the sandblasted samples possessed higher tensile strength.

Для цитирования: Denizoğlu Saip, Hanyaloğlu Cem S, Aksakal Bünyamin. Tensile bond strength of composite luting cements to metal alloys after various surface treatments.. Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research. 2009. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.52896.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.