Pregnancy hypertension · 2018
Concomitant intrauterine growth restriction alters the lipoprotein profile in preeclampsia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Contini Christine, Winkler B Sophia, Maass Nicolai, Alkatout Ibrahim, Winkler Karl, Pecks Ulrich
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are related conditions. We aimed to characterise common lipid changes.
METHODS: Triglyceride and cholesterol levels of patients 24-42 weeks of gestation with IUGR (n = 52), hypertensive IUGR (HIUGR, n = 28), and preeclampsia without IUGR (PE, n = 56) were compared to a control group (CTRL, n = 167). In addition, 60 sera (n = 10 of each pathology IUGR, HIUGR, PE (without IUGR) compared to n = 30 matched CTRL) of severe early onset cases <34 weeks of gestation were chosen and further analysed by ultracentrifugation lipid subfractionation including VLDL, IDL, LDL, and HDL composition.
RESULTS: In the full cohort we found low cholesterol in IUGR (p = 0.0405), while triglyceride levels were high in PE (p < 0.0001). Lipid concentrations in HIUGR did not differ significantly from CTRL. In the 60 patients analysed by lipid subfractionation, triglyceride levels were increased in the VLDL subfraction in PE (p < 0.01), however, LDL-bound ApoB and cholesterol levels were lower in IUGR and HIUGR (p < 0.0001 for total cholesterol and p < 0.001 for ApoB in both groups), but not in PE when compared to CTRL.
CONCLUSION: Low cholesterol, especially LDL cholesterol levels are a feature of IUGR while high triglyceride levels are a feature of preeclampsia. Increased VLDL-triglycerides suggest a disturbed conversion to LDL in preeclampsia. Of note, the presence of IUGR in hypertensive disorders further alters lipid profiles, which may explain heterogeneous data on lipid values for preeclampsia in the literature. Study groups have to be selected carefully to avoid misinterpretation.
METHODS: Triglyceride and cholesterol levels of patients 24-42 weeks of gestation with IUGR (n = 52), hypertensive IUGR (HIUGR, n = 28), and preeclampsia without IUGR (PE, n = 56) were compared to a control group (CTRL, n = 167). In addition, 60 sera (n = 10 of each pathology IUGR, HIUGR, PE (without IUGR) compared to n = 30 matched CTRL) of severe early onset cases <34 weeks of gestation were chosen and further analysed by ultracentrifugation lipid subfractionation including VLDL, IDL, LDL, and HDL composition.
RESULTS: In the full cohort we found low cholesterol in IUGR (p = 0.0405), while triglyceride levels were high in PE (p < 0.0001). Lipid concentrations in HIUGR did not differ significantly from CTRL. In the 60 patients analysed by lipid subfractionation, triglyceride levels were increased in the VLDL subfraction in PE (p < 0.01), however, LDL-bound ApoB and cholesterol levels were lower in IUGR and HIUGR (p < 0.0001 for total cholesterol and p < 0.001 for ApoB in both groups), but not in PE when compared to CTRL.
CONCLUSION: Low cholesterol, especially LDL cholesterol levels are a feature of IUGR while high triglyceride levels are a feature of preeclampsia. Increased VLDL-triglycerides suggest a disturbed conversion to LDL in preeclampsia. Of note, the presence of IUGR in hypertensive disorders further alters lipid profiles, which may explain heterogeneous data on lipid values for preeclampsia in the literature. Study groups have to be selected carefully to avoid misinterpretation.