Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2016
Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Suqing, Sun Jing, Cai Bin, Xi Xiaowei, Yang Liu, Sun Yunyan
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential risk factors associated with failed ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage (D&C) treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENTS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with CSP and treated with ultrasound-guided D&C at Shanghai General Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
INTERVENTION: Lesion resection using ultrasound-guided D&C.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical characteristics, vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, the size of the gestational sac, cardiac motion, blood flow around the gestational sac, cesarean scar thickness, and serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels were compared between the successful operation group and the failed operation group. Cesarean scar thickness was the main risk factor that determined the success of ultrasound-guided D&C. The success rates were 50% and 97.67% for those with cesarean scars <3 mm thick and those with scars >3 mm thick, respectively (p = .001). The success rate was also associated with the abundance of blood flow surrounding the capsule and size of the gestational sac (p < .005). Surgical success was not affected by abnormal vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, cardiac motion, or serum β-hCG levels.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided D&C is the first choice for treating CSP if the cesarean scar is >3 mm thick, blood flow is not abundant, and the maximum diameter of the gestational sac is <30 mm. A transabdominal procedure is preferred for patients with high-risk factors.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENTS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with CSP and treated with ultrasound-guided D&C at Shanghai General Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
INTERVENTION: Lesion resection using ultrasound-guided D&C.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical characteristics, vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, the size of the gestational sac, cardiac motion, blood flow around the gestational sac, cesarean scar thickness, and serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels were compared between the successful operation group and the failed operation group. Cesarean scar thickness was the main risk factor that determined the success of ultrasound-guided D&C. The success rates were 50% and 97.67% for those with cesarean scars <3 mm thick and those with scars >3 mm thick, respectively (p = .001). The success rate was also associated with the abundance of blood flow surrounding the capsule and size of the gestational sac (p < .005). Surgical success was not affected by abnormal vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, cardiac motion, or serum β-hCG levels.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided D&C is the first choice for treating CSP if the cesarean scar is >3 mm thick, blood flow is not abundant, and the maximum diameter of the gestational sac is <30 mm. A transabdominal procedure is preferred for patients with high-risk factors.